Re: [RFA] Backporting fold improvements from 4.x to 3.x

2006-04-23 Thread Richard Guenther
On 23 Apr 2006 17:07:44 +0200, Gabriel Dos Reis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > | Hi everyone, > | > | I made the following notes while backporting Alan Modra's patch for > PR26026 > | to 3.3 series. > > The 3.3.x series had been closed; I'm not clear

RE: [RFA] Backporting fold improvements from 4.x to 3.x

2006-04-23 Thread Dave Korn
On 23 April 2006 16:08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > "Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Hi everyone, >> >> I made the following notes while backporting Alan Modra's patch for >> PR26026 to 3.3 series. > > The 3.3.x series had been closed; I'm not clear what you mean by backport. >

Re: [RFA] Backporting fold improvements from 4.x to 3.x

2006-04-23 Thread Gabriel Dos Reis
"Dave Korn" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: | Hi everyone, | | I made the following notes while backporting Alan Modra's patch for PR26026 | to 3.3 series. The 3.3.x series had been closed; I'm not clear what you mean by backport. -- Gaby

[RFA] Backporting fold improvements from 4.x to 3.x

2006-04-22 Thread Dave Korn
Hi everyone, I made the following notes while backporting Alan Modra's patch for PR26026 to 3.3 series. There's been some major refactoring going on in the fold-const stuff, and I made some notes about what needed changing in order to realign snippets of fold() from 4-series with the form