Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > ISTR the name change was to avoid a switch named -fdump-rtl-rtl.
| > To invent an option name alias and use a minor repetition in it
| > as a reason for changing the old behavior is Bad.
|
| It is not merely an option name ali
Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
| > > ISTR the name change was to avoid a switch named -fdump-rtl-rtl.
| > To invent an option name alias and use a minor repetition in it
| > as a reason for changing the old behavior is Bad.
|
| It is not merely an option name alias. It came together w
On Feb 21, 2005 11:40 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:19:59 +0100
> > From: Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> > > Do you know of a reason why that isn't on by default?
> >
> > Because -fdump-rtl-expand-detailed includes *two* copies of the RTL:
> Date: Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:19:59 +0100
> From: Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Do you know of a reason why that isn't on by default?
>
> Because -fdump-rtl-expand-detailed includes *two* copies of the RTL: one
> lacks the prologue and epilogue but is interleaved with trees, the other
> i
> Ah, that's triggered by -fdump-rtl-expand-detailed (it is revision 2.28,
> for which I could not find an entry on gcc-patches).
Do you know of a reason why that isn't on by default?
Because -fdump-rtl-expand-detailed includes *two* copies of the RTL: one
lacks the prologue and epilogue but is
