Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/10/24 Bob Breuer :
>> Kai Tietz wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
>>> and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
>>> that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
>>>
>>> But could somebody give this p
2011/10/24 Bob Breuer :
> Kai Tietz wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
>> and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
>> that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
>>
>> But could somebody give this patch a try?
>>
>> Regards,
Kai Tietz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For trunk-version I have a tentative patch for this issue. On 4.6.x
> and older branches this doesn't work, as here we can't differenciate
> that easy between ms- and sysv-abi.
>
> But could somebody give this patch a try?
>
> Regards,
> Kai
>
> ChangeLog
>
>
2011/10/18 Bob Breuer :
> Kai Tietz wrote:
>> 2011/10/17 Bob Breuer :
>>> Richard Henderson wrote:
On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
> I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
> patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
>
> diff --git a
Kai Tietz wrote:
> 2011/10/17 Bob Breuer :
>> Richard Henderson wrote:
>>> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
ind
2011/10/17 Bob Breuer :
> Richard Henderson wrote:
>> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>>> I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
>>> patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
>>>
>>> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
>>> index a9fa608..dfbd6ea 100644
Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>> I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
>> patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
>>
>> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
>> index a9fa608..dfbd6ea 100644
>> --- a/cpu-exec.c
>> +++ b/cp
On 10/17/2011 12:14 PM, Blue Swirl wrote:
> IIRC buggy versions of alloca() could also fail without a frame pointer.
(1) GCC always uses a frame pointer for alloca,
(2) Unless you do -fno-builtin-alloca, we always implement it inline.
r~
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 5:22 PM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 10/17/2011 07:09 AM, Bob Breuer wrote:
>> I don't think this is a free/g_free issue. If I use the following
>> patch, then I at least get the openbios messages:
>>
>> diff --git a/cpu-exec.c b/cpu-exec.c
>> index a9fa608..dfbd6ea 1006
