RE: [Patch] MIPS FDE deletion

2016-02-15 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Wed, 10 Feb 2016, Moore, Catherine wrote: > > I saw your patch handles the `fn_stub' case among others and your test case > > included an `__fn_stub_foo' stub too, which is what PR target/53276 is all > > about, which is why I thought it may have been resolved and the existence > > of the PR a

RE: [Patch] MIPS FDE deletion

2016-02-10 Thread Moore, Catherine
> -Original Message- > From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:ma...@imgtec.com] > Sent: Tuesday, January 19, 2016 10:28 AM > To: Moore, Catherine > Cc: binut...@sourceware.org; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Sandiford > Subject: RE: [Patch] MIPS FDE deletion > > On Mon, 11 Ja

RE: [Patch] MIPS FDE deletion

2016-01-19 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
On Mon, 11 Jan 2016, Moore, Catherine wrote: > > Does it mean PR target/53276 has been fixed now? What was the commit to > > add .cfi support for the stubs? > > I don't know about the status of PR target/53276. The commit to add > .cfi support for call stubs was this one: > > r184379 | rsand

RE: [Patch] MIPS FDE deletion

2016-01-11 Thread Moore, Catherine
> -Original Message- > From: Maciej W. Rozycki [mailto:ma...@imgtec.com] > Sent: Monday, January 11, 2016 5:00 PM > To: Moore, Catherine > Cc: binut...@sourceware.org; gcc@gcc.gnu.org; Richard Sandiford > Subject: Re: [Patch] MIPS FDE deletion > > Hi Catherine,

Re: [Patch] MIPS FDE deletion

2016-01-11 Thread Maciej W. Rozycki
Hi Catherine, On Fri, 16 Oct 2015, Moore, Catherine wrote: > MIPS16 call stubs now have .cfi directives. If the linker decides that > one of these call stubs is not required, it will emit incorrect frame > info. This patch suppresses the generation of the frame info by setting > the output s