Hi Joseph, Jakub,
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 09:51:35PM +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 08:44:25PM +, Joseph Myers via Gcc wrote:
> > On Thu, 27 Feb 2025, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
> >
> > > Can you please confirm if we should add a version of this operator that
> >
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 08:44:25PM +, Joseph Myers via Gcc wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2025, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
>
> > Can you please confirm if we should add a version of this operator that
> > need not be diagnosed under pedantic mode? If so, I'll propose this
>
> I'm doubtful of
On Thu, 27 Feb 2025, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
> Can you please confirm if we should add a version of this operator that
> need not be diagnosed under pedantic mode? If so, I'll propose this
I'm doubtful of the need for a second variant, but in any case the
starting point should be a pat
Hi Joseph, Aaron,
(Aaron, there's no code in this email, so you should be able to read it,
I guess. We're just discussing the naming of the operator.)
Context for readers: The C Committee has finally accepted this as
_Countof instead of _Lengthof, due to the concerns regarding confusion
with st
