Hi Rasmus,
> On 04 Jun 2020, at 15:31, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
>> Unfortunately, no, not really: while we don't break it
>> intentionally, it was transitioned to End Of Life a couple
>> of years a ago and we don't test on such configurations
>> any more.
>>
>> We are gradually going to a simi
On 03/06/2020 19.41, Olivier Hainque wrote:
> Hi Rasmus,
>
>> On 26 May 2020, at 16:52, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>>
>> libstdc++, but I'd like some feedback on whether vxworks 5 is even
>> supposed to be (still) supported before digging further.
>
> Unfortunately, no, not really: while we don't b
Hi Rasmus,
> On 26 May 2020, at 16:52, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
> Hi Olivier et al
>
> I'm having quite a bit of trouble getting gcc 10 to build for our
> vxworks 5 (5.5.1) target. The first thing I hit is
>
> #if !defined(_WRS_VXWORKS_MAJOR)
> #error "VxWorks version macros needed but not de
Hi Rasmus,
> On 26 May 2020, at 16:52, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>
> Hi Olivier et al
>
> I'm having quite a bit of trouble getting gcc 10 to build for our
> vxworks 5 (5.5.1) target.
Thanks for your message.
VxWorks 5 was transitioned
to End Of Life long ago so we're not testing for it any mor
Hi Olivier et al
I'm having quite a bit of trouble getting gcc 10 to build for our
vxworks 5 (5.5.1) target. The first thing I hit is
#if !defined(_WRS_VXWORKS_MAJOR)
#error "VxWorks version macros needed but not defined"
#endif
Our version.h doesn't define that macro (however, there's a
_WRS_VX
