Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Ian Lance Taylor
Michael Witten writes: > I am intending to send them again to the proper list; is this > considered the correct move now that the patches have been sent here? Yes. Ian

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 28 April 2011 01:03, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28 April 2011 00:56, Michael Witten wrote: >> On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >>> You also need to explain the reason for your patches. >>> >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches >>> >>> 1 and 2 might be self-explana

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 28 April 2011 00:56, Michael Witten wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> You also need to explain the reason for your patches. >> >> http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches >> >> 1 and 2 might be self-explanatory, but what are 3 and 4 for?  Why are >> your change

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Witten
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:48, Michael Witten wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 28 April 2011 00:32, Michael Witten wrote: >>> See the following emails for a few inlined patches >>> to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi: >>>... >> >> Patches should go to gcc-patches, no

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Witten
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:50, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > You also need to explain the reason for your patches. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches > > 1 and 2 might be self-explanatory, but what are 3 and 4 for?  Why are > your changes useful? Thank you for the help; however, I believe

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 28 April 2011 00:48, Michael Witten wrote: > On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote: >> On 28 April 2011 00:32, Michael Witten wrote: >>> See the following emails for a few inlined patches >>> to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi: >>>... >> >> Patches should go to gcc-patches, not this

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Witten
On Wed, Apr 27, 2011 at 18:42, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 28 April 2011 00:32, Michael Witten wrote: >> See the following emails for a few inlined patches >> to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi: >>... > > Patches should go to gcc-patches, not this list. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/lists.html > I apologize!

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Jonathan Wakely
On 28 April 2011 00:32, Michael Witten wrote: > See the following emails for a few inlined patches > to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi: > >  [1] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency >  [2] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from lines >  [3] Docs: extend.texi: Rearrange nodes

[PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Witten
See the following emails for a few inlined patches to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi: [1] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency [2] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from lines [3] Docs: extend.texi: Rearrange nodes; no text was removed or added [4] Docs: extend.texi