Please can this patch be considered? It's several months old (sent in
Jan 2011), and it is critical to use of GCC on GNU/kFreeBSD.
2011/1/26 Robert Millan :
> Ping!
>
> 2011/1/18 Robert Millan :
>> 2011/1/14 Robert Millan :
>>> 2011/1/12 Robert Millan :
> * The headers config/kfreebsd-gnu.h et
I advise CC:ing the relevant target maintainers on such patch submissions.
Since there is no *-kfreebsd-gnu maintainer (you might wish to volunteer
to be such), and no *-linux* maintainer for the linux*.h changes, this
means the people listed as maintainers of the i386 port.
--
Joseph S. Myer
Ping^2
2011/1/26 Robert Millan :
> Ping!
>
> 2011/1/18 Robert Millan :
>> 2011/1/14 Robert Millan :
>>> 2011/1/12 Robert Millan :
> * The headers config/kfreebsd-gnu.h etc. override
> GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER. But the 64-bit configurations
> x86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu and x86_64-*-knetbsd*-
Ping!
2011/1/18 Robert Millan :
> 2011/1/14 Robert Millan :
>> 2011/1/12 Robert Millan :
* The headers config/kfreebsd-gnu.h etc. override
GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER. But the 64-bit configurations
x86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu and x86_64-*-knetbsd*-gnu do not appear to
use any header th
2011/1/14 Robert Millan :
> 2011/1/12 Robert Millan :
>>> * The headers config/kfreebsd-gnu.h etc. override
>>> GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER. But the 64-bit configurations
>>> x86_64-*-kfreebsd*-gnu and x86_64-*-knetbsd*-gnu do not appear to
>>> use any header that would override GLIBC_DYNAMIC_LINKER32
