> In the same vein as my 20050418 patch, may be the following will help.
> Tested on x86_64-linux.
Looks reasonable to me. Of course it would be nice if the underlying bug
were fixed at some point, but that's another issue.
> 2005-05-15 Laurent GUERBY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> * ada/acats/
On Thu, 2006-05-04 at 19:40 +0200, Richard Guenther wrote:
> On Thu, 4 May 2006, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> > I see that from time to time, more on SMP/dual core machines, if you add
> > sync or sleep it goes away but the run is slower. I've always assumed
> > it's some kind of process/kernel/fs race
