Re: [PATCH] COND_EXPRs in GIMPLE code and vectorizer

2006-11-14 Thread Roberto COSTA
Paolo Bonzini wrote: a) if anyone propagates a value anywhere, she should check whether the propagated value is part of a comparison in a COND_EXPR (and explicitly fold the comparison, if so). b) in case of a COND_EXPR, fold_ternary (...) in fold-const.c folds the comparison before doing anyt

Re: [PATCH] COND_EXPRs in GIMPLE code and vectorizer

2006-10-17 Thread Roberto COSTA
Roberto COSTA wrote: Diego Novillo wrote: Roberto COSTA wrote on 09/28/06 05:51: If time allows me, I'd like to try to see what happens if COND_EXPRs are kept throughout the GIMPLE passes (I confess I'm curious). Logically, I see them as richer constructs (they carry more information than