On Wed, 30 Apr 2014, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> > On 04/29/14 05:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> > >
> > > The following patch forces the availability of a 64bit HWI
> > > (without applying the cleanups that result from this). I propose
> > > this exact patch f
On 04/30/2014 05:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/30/14 02:16, Richard Biener wrote:
>>
>> Testing coverage for non-64bit hwi configs is really low these
>> days (I know of only 32bit hppa-*-* that is still built and
>> tested semi-regularly - Dave, I suppose the host compiler
>> has a 64bit long lon
On 30-Apr-14, at 4:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Testing coverage for non-64bit hwi configs is really low these
days (I know of only 32bit hppa-*-* that is still built and
tested semi-regularly - Dave, I suppose the host compiler
has a 64bit long long type there, right?).
I'm OK with this chang
On 4/30/2014 12:00 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
My recollection is that HP aCC supports long long, but I don't recall
when support for that was introduced. I'm really trying hard to
forget hpux-isms.
Plus, they can always start the bootstrapping process with GCC 4.9.
I can't remember but without ans
On 04/30/14 02:16, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/29/14 05:21, Richard Biener wrote:
The following patch forces the availability of a 64bit HWI
(without applying the cleanups that result from this). I propose
this exact patch for a short time to get those th
On Tue, 29 Apr 2014, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/29/14 05:21, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > The following patch forces the availability of a 64bit HWI
> > (without applying the cleanups that result from this). I propose
> > this exact patch for a short time to get those that are affected
> > and do
On 04/29/14 05:21, Richard Biener wrote:
The following patch forces the availability of a 64bit HWI
(without applying the cleanups that result from this). I propose
this exact patch for a short time to get those that are affected
and do not want to be affected scream.
But honestly I don't see
The following patch forces the availability of a 64bit HWI
(without applying the cleanups that result from this). I propose
this exact patch for a short time to get those that are affected
and do not want to be affected scream.
But honestly I don't see any important host architecture that
not al