On Fri, Aug 8, 2014 at 1:16 AM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Currently, we treat predicates as "second-class" citizens:
> - assume any identifier as a valid predicate
> - cannot write more complex predicates than an identifier in match-op
>
> I was wondering whether it would be a good idea
> to av
Currently, we treat predicates as "second-class" citizens:
- assume any identifier as a valid predicate
- cannot write more complex predicates than an identifier in match-op
I was wondering whether it would be a good idea
to ave user-defined predicates,
instead of hard-coding them as macros in gim
