It seems that the problem is solved now. Thank you! I've sent
corresponding patches to gcc-patches.
--
Cheers, Roman Gareev.
On 21/07/2014 14:55, Roman Gareev wrote:
It seems S_6 is now scheduled before S_4 which is surprising, as
dependences from S_4 to S_6 should prevent us from generating a schedule
that yields such a result. What is the schedule that you give to the isl ast
generator?
The schedule generated by th
> It seems S_6 is now scheduled before S_4 which is surprising, as
> dependences from S_4 to S_6 should prevent us from generating a schedule
> that yields such a result. What is the schedule that you give to the isl ast
> generator?
The schedule generated by the code, which uses variable k (It ex
On 21/07/2014 14:23, Roman Gareev wrote:
I've attached the patch, which contains generation of Gimple code from
isl_ast_node_block.
However, I've found out a problem. The following example:
int k = 50;
static int __attribute__((noinline))
foo ()
{
int i, res;
for (i = 0, res = 0; i < k; i
I've attached the patch, which contains generation of Gimple code from
isl_ast_node_block.
However, I've found out a problem. The following example:
int k = 50;
static int __attribute__((noinline))
foo ()
{
int i, res;
for (i = 0, res = 0; i < k; i++)
res += i;
return res;
}
extern vo
