On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Richard Biener
> wrote:
>> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
>> wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>Apparently this pattern is not getting fired (even in isolation).
>>>
>>> /* x % 1 -> 0 */
>>> (
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 4:37 PM, Richard Biener
wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>Apparently this pattern is not getting fired (even in isolation).
>>
>> /* x % 1 -> 0 */
>> (simplify
>> (trunc_mod @0 integer_onep)
>> { build_zero_cst (type);
On Sun, Aug 17, 2014 at 9:50 PM, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
> Hi,
>Apparently this pattern is not getting fired (even in isolation).
>
> /* x % 1 -> 0 */
> (simplify
> (trunc_mod @0 integer_onep)
> { build_zero_cst (type); })
>
> I tried with this test-case:
> int f(int x)
> {
> int t1 =
Hi,
Apparently this pattern is not getting fired (even in isolation).
/* x % 1 -> 0 */
(simplify
(trunc_mod @0 integer_onep)
{ build_zero_cst (type); })
I tried with this test-case:
int f(int x)
{
int t1 = 1;
int t2 = x % t1;
return t2;
}
I get the following output in ccp1 dump file
