On Mon, 2023-04-03 at 18:46 +0200, Benjamin Priour wrote:
> Following last mail, a classic I forgot to link my draft !
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MaLDo-Rt8yrJIvC1MO8SmFc6fp4eRQM_JeSdv-1kbsc/edit?usp=sharing
Some notes:
* The document still has some notes in italics marked "[RFC]" whic
Following last mail, a classic I forgot to link my draft !
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MaLDo-Rt8yrJIvC1MO8SmFc6fp4eRQM_JeSdv-1kbsc/edit?usp=sharing
Best,
Benjamin.
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 6:44 PM Benjamin Priour wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:38 AM David Malcolm wrote:
Hi David,
On Mon, Apr 3, 2023 at 12:38 AM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> To be fair, C ones can be as well; the analyzer's exploded graphs tend
> to get very big on anything but the most trivial examples.
>
>
>
[...snip...]
>
> Indeed - you'll have to do a lot of looking at gimple IR dumps, what
> t
