On 09/20/2010 09:58 AM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
This patch tries to implement the C++0x featue "Forward declarations
for enums" aka "opaque enum declarations":
Great! BTW, please send C++ patches to gcc-patches and CC me so that I
see them right away; I tend to fall behind on the mailing lists.
I had to initialize the variable nested_being_defined to get it to compile
(possible uninitialized warning). I initialized it to false.
>>> Ok, actually it is never used uninitialized, but let's get rid of the
>>> warning.
>>>
>> I saw that it was never used uninitialized and was s
On 09/21/2010 07:05 PM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
>>> I had to initialize the variable nested_being_defined to get it to compile
>>> (possible uninitialized warning). I initialized it to false.
>>>
>> Ok, actually it is never used uninitialized, but let's get rid of the
>> warning.
>>
> I sa
> I saw the flag situation after I sent my message. There must be a "Keeper of
> the Sacred Tree Flag Set"
There are a few comments en tree.h about that, I if remember correctly...
> I get the idea the real estate is at a premium and consuming flags could be
> a problem.
> Perhaps there is a con
On 09/21/2010 07:05 PM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
I had to initialize the variable nested_being_defined to get it to compile
(possible uninitialized warning). I initialized it to false.
Ok, actually it is never used uninitialized, but let's get rid of the warning.
I saw that it was never u
> I had to initialize the variable nested_being_defined to get it to compile
> (possible uninitialized warning). I initialized it to false.
Ok, actually it is never used uninitialized, but let's get rid of the warning.
> It looks like the first two are related. What does an enum look like in
> t
On 09/20/2010 09:58 AM, Rodrigo Rivas wrote:
Hello all.
This patch tries to implement the C++0x featue "Forward declarations
for enums" aka "opaque enum declarations":
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2764.pdf
Please note that this is a WIP, and as such lacks formatting,
Rivas
Sent: Monday, September 20, 2010 6:58 AM
To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: [C++0x] implementing forward declarations for enums
Hello all.
This patch tries to implement the C++0x featue "Forward declarations for enums"
aka "opaque enum declarations":
http://www.open-std.org
Hello all.
This patch tries to implement the C++0x featue "Forward declarations
for enums" aka "opaque enum declarations":
http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2008/n2764.pdf
Please note that this is a WIP, and as such lacks formatting,
comments, testcases, etc.
Except for the thin
