Laurent GUERBY wrote:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
working on those FAIL?
Uros looked at this for me and thinks it might be due to
On Sun, 2008-02-24 at 09:23 -0500, Kaveh R. GHAZI wrote:
> On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>
> > Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
> >
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
> >
> > I see lots
On Sun, 24 Feb 2008, Laurent GUERBY wrote:
> Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
>
> I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
> working on those
Laurent GUERBY writes:
> Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
>
> I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
> working on those FAIL?
>
> I collec
Clear for Ada on x86 and x86_64-linux:
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01630.html
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2008-02/msg01586.html
I see lots of libmudflap FAIL on both targets though, is someone
working on those FAIL?
I collected on gcc-testresults quite good Ada res