Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Diego Novillo wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 13:10, Janis Johnson wrote:
Basile, people are saying that MELT no longer belongs in a branch of
the GCC repository because now that plug-ins are s
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 7:30 PM, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Diego Novillo wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 13:10, Janis Johnson wrote:
>>
>>
>>>
>>> Basile, people are saying that MELT no longer belongs in a branch of
>>> the GCC repository because now that plug-ins are supported, MELT no
>>
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Basile, people are saying that MELT no longer belongs in a branch of
> the GCC repository because now that plug-ins are supported, MELT no
> longer needs to modify GCC itself and can be maintained independently.
> That does not mean that MELT cannot be a
Diego Novillo wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 13:10, Janis Johnson wrote:
Basile, people are saying that MELT no longer belongs in a branch of
the GCC repository because now that plug-ins are supported, MELT no
longer needs to modify GCC itself and can be maintained independently.
MELT is n
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 13:10, Janis Johnson wrote:
> Basile, people are saying that MELT no longer belongs in a branch of
> the GCC repository because now that plug-ins are supported, MELT no
> longer needs to modify GCC itself and can be maintained independently.
> That does not mean that MELT c
On Tue, 2009-06-16 at 14:22 +0200, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> I (Basile) very probably misunderstood what Joseph Myers or Richard
> Guenther meant. What I might have [mis]understood scares me. This is a
> request for clarification.
> Did I understood that in your view no branch hosted on GCC
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> > > I thought on the contrary that is was expected that some code would become
> > > FSF
> > > owned plugins?
> > >
> >
> > Not without a mechanism for linking plugins in statically on hosts for which
> > we don't support dynamic loading of
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 2:22 PM, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>
> I (Basile) very probably misunderstood what Joseph Myers or Richard Guenther
> meant. What I might have [mis]understood scares me. This is a request for
> clarification.
>
>
> Joseph S. Myers wrote:
>
>
>> On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Basile
I (Basile) very probably misunderstood what Joseph Myers or Richard
Guenther meant. What I might have [mis]understood scares me. This is a
request for clarification.
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
I thought on the contrary that is was expected
On Tue, 16 Jun 2009, Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> I thought on the contrary that is was expected that some code would become FSF
> owned plugins?
Not without a mechanism for linking plugins in statically on hosts for
which we don't support dynamic loading of plugins, and even then it's
doubtfu
Richard Guenther wrote:
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Can a branch be simply a plugin, or should I close (soon) the melt-branch
and start a melt-plugin-branch on the SVN. If I do that, do I need some
authorization? from whom?
On Tue, Jun 16, 2009 at 1:13 PM, Basile
STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
> Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
>>
>>
>> Can a branch be simply a plugin, or should I close (soon) the melt-branch
>> and start a melt-plugin-branch on the SVN. If I do that, do I need some
>> authorization? from whom?
>
>
> Apparently, not
Basile STARYNKEVITCH wrote:
Can a branch be simply a plugin, or should I close (soon) the
melt-branch and start a melt-plugin-branch on the SVN. If I do that,
do I need some authorization? from whom?
Apparently, nothing very special is required to start a new branch. So I
intend to creat
> "Basile" == Basile STARYNKEVITCH writes:
Basile> Can a branch be simply a plugin, or should I close (soon) the
Basile> melt-branch and start a melt-plugin-branch on the SVN. If I do that,
Basile> do I need some authorization? from whom?
I think what you do on your branch is up to you. If
Hello All,
To make MELT more interesting & more easy to use, I want to make it
become a (big & meta *) plugin. I also need to document & illustrate it
much more. I actually did start to work on the pluginification of MELT:
I mean making MELT a real GCC plugin, not needing any core GCC patch
a
15 matches
Mail list logo
