On 09/15/2009 02:22 PM, Mark Zweers wrote:
While experimenting with "Defaulted and deleting functions" on my brand-newly
downloaded gcc-4.5 compiler, I've noticed the following: the order of '=default' and
'=delete' matters with template member functions.
I'm about to check in a fix for this,
On 9/15/09, Mark Zweers wrote:
> While experimenting with "Defaulted and deleting functions" on my
> brand-newly downloaded gcc-4.5 compiler, I've noticed the following: the
> order of '=default' and '=delete' matters with template member functions.
>
> template
> class NonCopyable {
> public:
>
On Tue, Sep 15, 2009 at 8:17 PM, Mark Zweers wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> While experimenting with "Defaulted and deleting functions" on my brand-newly
> downloaded gcc-4.5 compiler, I've noticed the following: the order of
> '=default' and '=delete' matters with template member functions.
>
> template