Thanks Paolo, ADL is news to me.
On 24 April 2013 01:43, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> You are: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument-dependent_name_lookup
>
> Paolo.
>
Hi,
Here's a simple program:
#include
#include
int main()
{
std::vector vec;
count(vec.begin(), vec.end(), 0); // shouldn't this be std::count ?
}
The above compiles successfully, but I think it shouldn't. I expect a
message like "error: `count` not declared in scope" because I meant t
> On 21.09.2012 23:08, bd satish wrote:
>> g++ -fmudflap references.cc -lmudflap
>
> you have to install mudflap to use it (it is suggested by the gcc-4.7
> package).
> sudo apt-get install libmudflap0-4.7-dev
>
own-linux-gnu/libmudflap/../../../libmudflap/mf-runtime.c:1436:
undefined reference to `__real_free'
PS: Please keep me in CC, I'm not subscribed to the list.
Thanks & Regards,
Satish
On 22 September 2012 08:11, bd satish wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Here is the output of (gcc -v):
&
rank Ch. Eigler wrote:
> bd satish writes:
>
>> [...]
>> The following piece of code, gives "undefined references" to
>> __real_malloc, __real_free, etc.:
>> Compiled with:
>> g++ -fmudflap references.cc -lmudflap
>>
>> /lib64/libmudflap.a
Hi,
The following piece of code, gives "undefined references" to
__real_malloc, __real_free, etc.:
// references.cc
#include
void func(int& x) {
x = 0;
}
int main() {
int* p = NULL;
func(*p);
}
Compiled with:
g++ -fmudflap references.cc -lmudflap
/lib64/libmudflap.a(mf-runtime.o): In
Hi,
All these days there used to be different tarballs like
gcc-core-*.tar.bz2, gcc-fortran-*.tar.bz2, etc. in the snapshot
directory ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/snapshots/LATEST-4.7. But now I
see only one combined tarball (starting with 4.7-20110528). I liked
separate tarballs on a per-language ba
Hi,
I'm trying to close a file using fclose, but the following program seg-faults:
#include
int main(void)
{
FILE* fp = fopen("unfounded.txt", "r");
if(fp == NULL)
fclose(fp);
return 0;
}
The file I'm trying to open doesn't exist in the directory, so fp is
indeed NULL.
Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 12:08 -0500, Daniel Jacobowitz wrote:
On Fri, Feb 11, 2005 at 12:00:26PM -0500, Daniel Berlin wrote:
Because if it's a show stopper, then so will be arch, monotone, or any
of our other replacements (they all either store the entire repo on your
disk, or
Daniel Berlin wrote:
On Fri, 2005-02-11 at 17:13 +, Joern RENNECKE wrote:
Joseph S. Myers wrote:
You mean the revision number of the whole checked out tree, which the
"svnversion" utility will tell you in any checked out svn tree (including
whether the tree is modified or mixed version). Giv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Joern RENNECKE wrote:
| Daniel Berlin wrote:
|
|>
|> And towards this end,i'm working on making blame a lot faster
|>
|>
|
| Will this also cover annotate using an -r option to go past the last
| reformatting
| delta?
|
|> Other than that, what operatio
Daniel Berlin wrote:
You can't mix svn and svk commits against the same repo. It confuses svk
(not svn).
You can use svk readonly, of course.
Actually, that's not quite right. While svk's depot must only be used by
svk, the usual usage is to mirror a regular subversion repository with
svk into a sv
12 matches
Mail list logo
