On Tue, Feb 27, 2018 at 9:46 PM, Paulo Matos wrote:
>
> Apologies for the clash on resources. Using gcc115 and gcc116 only now.
>
Thank you, Paulo.
--
Yao (齐尧)
Hi Paulo,
I noticed that GDB buildbot pending build queue on aarch64-linux
becomes longer and longer,
https://gdb-build.sergiodj.net/builders/Ubuntu-AArch64-m64
as it takes longer to finish each build and test.
Looks that you deployed aarch64-linux buildslave for GCC buildbot
on gcc114 as well, th
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 4:02 PM, Yao Qi wrote:
>
> Hi,
> I observed that gfortran 7.2 and 8.0 generate different debug info for
> dynamical array.
> Attributes DW_AT_data_location and DW_AT_allocated are different. There
> is an extra "DW_OP_plus_uconst: 8"
Hi,
I observed that gfortran 7.2 and 8.0 generate different debug info for
dynamical array. Here is a case simplified from gdb test case
gdb.fortran/vla-datatypes.f90
$ cat vla-datatypes.f90
program vla_primitives
integer, allocatable:: intvla(:, :, :)
logical :: l
al
On 17-11-20 09:33:46, Martin Sebor wrote:
> On 11/20/2017 08:51 AM, Yao Qi wrote:
> >
> >Hi,
> >I failed to compile GDB with GCC trunk (8.0.0 20171117) because of some
> >-Werror=stringop-overflow= and -Werror=stringop-truncation warnings.
> >Some of them are not
Hi,
I failed to compile GDB with GCC trunk (8.0.0 20171117) because of some
-Werror=stringop-overflow= and -Werror=stringop-truncation warnings.
Some of them are not necessary to me,
1. ../../binutils-gdb/gdb/python/py-gdb-readline.c:79:15: error: ‘char*
strncpy(char*, const char*, size_t)’ outp
On Fri, Sep 22, 2017 at 7:30 PM, David Edelsohn wrote:
> I am pleased to announce that the GCC Steering Committee has
> appointed Tom de Vries as nvptx maintainer.
>
Congratulations, Tom!
--
Yao (齐尧)
This
mode doesn't scale very well. IMO, it is necessary to have a
target-independent framework for code size optimization. I have no
idea to do that framework though.
--
Yao Qi
CodeSourcery
y...@codesourcery.com
(650) 331-3385 x739
want to mark the operation as a potential reference
to a and b".
My questions is
How many aliases do p have? According to the doc here, it is
said that "p will have two aliases, namely variables a and b." What I
learned from compiler book is that p points-to &a, and q points
Thanks for your comments. Here is a patch for it.
2005-09-22 Yao Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* gcc/intl/Makefile.in (distclean): Add config.cache.
* gcc/fixincludes/Makefile.in (distclean): Likewise.
Index: gcc/fixincludes/Makef
anyone like to take some look? Any suggestion and
comments are highly appreciated!
May I code a patch on this?
--
Regards, Yao
Yao Qi
abort when executed.
It seems that this problem itself has nothing to do with rs6000 backend and
I was confused by the symptom at first.
Thank you very much for all your previous reply.
Best Regards
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
blend
together.
Best Regards
----
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
ured the compiler and exactly what options you pass.
Ian
Best Regards
----
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
http://messenger.msn.clic
From: "Meissner, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Thu, 8 Sep 2005 21:19:25 -0400
Yes, the eABI is a modification of the System V ABI. IIRC (but it has
been several
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Yao qi)
CC: ian@airs.com, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Fri, 9 Sep 2005 01:51:58 -0400 (EDT)
> BTW, I am concerned about the value of TARGET_HARD_FLOAT and
TARGET_FPRS,
> I think both
ing is
enabled for whatever pass is executing at the moment. Using -da turns
on debugging for all RTL passes.
Ian
Best Regards
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
FREE pop-up blocking with the new MSN Toolbar - ge
othing about it. Could anyone tell me which file define these two macros?
I grep it in gcc/config/rs6000/ but it seems that there is no file define
it. Could
anybody here have a look at it and verify it for me, any comments are highly
appreicated.
Thanks in advance!
Best Regards
-
From: Ian Lance Taylor
To: "Yao Qi qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: 07 Sep 2005 09:14:49 -0700
"Yao Qi qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
It might help if you give a brief overview of what you are tryi
From: "Meissner, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao Qi qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Wed, 7 Sep 2005 13:11:50 -0400
There was also a PowerPC NT ABI at one point, but since Windows NT on
PowerPC wa
From: Ian Lance Taylor
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: 06 Sep 2005 11:05:38 -0700
"Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
These are partially documented in gcc/doc/tm.texi. Unfortunately the
d
From: "Meissner, Michael" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: RE: var_args for rs6000 backend
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2005 14:13:56 -0400
And note Yao qi, that there are different ABIs on the rs6000, each of
which has dif
21 }
And I compile it like this:
[qiyao@ qiyao]$ gcc -o nan-3 nan-3.c
And run it,
[qiyao@ qiyao]$ ./nan-3
error 1
error 2
error 3
error 5
It seems that the result do not obey IEEE754. I am not so sure about it, Anyone
could confirm or deny this? Thanks in advance!
--
Regards, Yao
Yao Qi
? May I need to
know the architecture of PowerPC and ABI for it?
Any one could clarify it for me. Thanks in advance!
Best Regards
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
Is your PC infected? Get a FREE online
question. My solution to this is just to remove
./config.cache in every sub-directories and try again. This solution
is effective although I am not sure about it. Anyone could confirm or
deny this.
I think "make distclean" should be done before ./configure if the
option of configure is changed.
--
Regards, Yao
Yao Qi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
> look at --enable-checking
> and
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html
> There are more cflags...
>
> The gcc/Makefile.in is also a good reference :)
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Jiang
;[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/configure.html
> look at --enable-checking
> and
> http://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html
> There are more cflags...
>
> The gcc/Makefile.in is also a good reference :)
>
> > Thanks,
> >
> > -Jiang
Hi,Pinski,
Got it! Thanks.
Best Regards
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC
Date: Thu, 18 A
From: Andrew Pinski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Yao qi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
CC: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Keyword _Imaginary in C99 standard and in GCC
Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2005 23:07:49 -0400
On Aug 18, 2005, at 11:04 PM, Yao qi wrote:
Hi, everyone,
I have looked th
ned that. Maybe GCC does not include it as
a keyword, I am not sure about that, am I missing something? Maybe someone
of you could clarify for me. Thanks in advance.
Best Regards
----
Yao Qi
Bejing Institute of Technology
_
30 matches
Mail list logo
