On Nov 18, 2007 12:11 PM, Mark Mitchell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> In particular, in the
> current implementation, none of the debug information for the bodies of
> functions (i.e., that describing local variables, line numbers for
> statements, etc.) is required for LTO processing. The LTO us
Sharing beteen the debug info and the LTO info is a very a good thing, and
I feel that we should not adopt a solution that breaks that. I'd really rather
leave 'strip --strip-debug' broken than bloat up the object files. The sort of
solution I would favor would be to make 'strip' smarter so that
It appears that portions of the LTO information are emitted in the usual
debugging sections, rather, information that would already be present there
is shared. This is great for reducing the size of object files that
contain both
LTO info and debugging info, but means that LTO breaks if 'strip --s
