Re: About Bug 52485

Thanks to your brand new Bugzilla account, you may now comment! :-) You will receive instructions on how to reset your default default password and access your account. Please let me know if you have any questions or trouble gaining access. I'd be happy to help in any way that I can! Thanks for

Re: GCC and Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 10:10 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: > Is there anything GCC could be doing at the compiler level to mitigate > the recently-announced Meltdown and Spectre vulnerabilities? From > reading about them, it seems like they involve speculative execution > and indirect branch prediction

Re: Basic Block Statistics

source with information about how to build/run: https://github.com/whh8b/bb_stats If you are interested in more information, just send me an email. Thanks again for everyone's help! Will On Sat, May 20, 2017 at 11:29 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: > On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Jeff Law wrot

Re: Basic Block Statistics

On Fri, May 19, 2017 at 4:40 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/17/2017 08:22 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >>>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Will Hawkins wro

Re: Basic Block Statistics

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:59 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >>> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>>> On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wro

Re: Basic Block Statistics

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 2:41 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >> On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wrote: >>>> As I started looking into this, it seems like

Re: Basic Block Statistics

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:04 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: > On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >> On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wrote: >>> As I started looking into this, it seems like PLUGIN_FINISH is where >>> my plugin will go. Everything is great so

Re: Basic Block Statistics

On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 1:02 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/17/2017 10:36 AM, Will Hawkins wrote: >> As I started looking into this, it seems like PLUGIN_FINISH is where >> my plugin will go. Everything is great so far. However, when plugins >> at that event are invoked, they ge

Re: Basic Block Statistics

hing silly. Thanks again for all your help getting me started on this! Will On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:54 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/16/2017 12:37 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote: >>> On 05/16/2017 12:24 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >

Re: Basic Block Statistics

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:45 PM, David Malcolm wrote: > On Tue, 2017-05-16 at 14:24 -0400, Will Hawkins wrote: >> Hello everyone! >> >> I apologize if this is not the right venue to ask this question >> and/or >> this is a waste of your time. >> >>

Re: Basic Block Statistics

On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 2:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 05/16/2017 12:24 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >> Hello everyone! >> >> I apologize if this is not the right venue to ask this question and/or >> this is a waste of your time. >> >> I was just wondering if ther

Basic Block Statistics

Hello everyone! I apologize if this is not the right venue to ask this question and/or this is a waste of your time. I was just wondering if there are statistics that gcc can emit that includes either a) the average number of instructions per basic block and/or b) the average size (in bytes) per

Re: History of GCC

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:23 PM, Eric Gallager wrote: > On 10/26/16, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Will Hawkins wrote: >>> >>> Thank you for your response! I don't think that there has to be >>> controversy to be interestin

Re: History of GCC

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:28 PM, Richard Kenner wrote: >> The Ada frontend was developed at AdaCore. > > The Ada frontend was developed at NYU, as an Air Force-funded project > to show that Ada95 (then called Ada9X) was implementable. AdaCore was > later formed once that was complete to provide c

Re: History of GCC

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:15 PM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:31 AM, Will Hawkins wrote: >> >> Thank you for your response! I don't think that there has to be >> controversy to be interesting. Obviously that split/reunification was >> i

Re: History of GCC

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 1:06 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 06:57:31PM +0200, Marek Polacek wrote: >> I think you can learn a lot if you follow the Changes pages, so e.g. >> , and go back down the history until >> you reach the ancient

Re: History of GCC

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 11:55 AM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 10/26/2016 07:07 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: >> >> On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >>> >>> >>> My name is Will Hawkins and I am a longtime user of gcc and admirer of >>>

Re: History of GCC

On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Ian Lance Taylor wrote: > On Tue, Oct 25, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Will Hawkins wrote: >> >> My name is Will Hawkins and I am a longtime user of gcc and admirer of >> the project. I hope that this is the proper forum for the question I >> a

History of GCC

Hello everyone! My name is Will Hawkins and I am a longtime user of gcc and admirer of the project. I hope that this is the proper forum for the question I am going to ask. If it isn't, please accept my apology and ignore me. I am a real geek and I love the history behind open source pro