Hi,
I would like to provide a kind of iPhone-like api on non apple hardware
using Objective-C
and I wanted to know if there will be one day support of Objective-C
2.0(at least property syntax) ?
Thanks
On Thu, 24 Sep 2009 12:53:04 -0400, Jason Merrill
wrote:
> On 09/24/2009 11:22 AM, Chris Lattner wrote:
>> Can the lambda (containing X) be copied and put onto a queue? What is
>> its type?
>
> As you said, the lambda has a unique anonymous type. If you want to put
> multiple lambdas into a con
On Wed, 16 Sep 2009 09:20:58 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor
wrote:
> Mark Mitchell writes:
>
>> Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
>>
>>> programs. So it seems to me that any changes that Apple makes to gcc
>>> (or gdb, emacs, etc.) can simply be brought over by any interested
>>> party.
>>
>> I'd certainly chec
On Tue, 15 Sep 2009 16:03:35 +0200, Tristan Gingold
wrote:
> On Sep 15, 2009, at 3:46 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> The status is that there is no status, unfortunately (it's an
>> interesting extension...).
>>
>> This extension is not presently implemented in the FSF GCC.
>> AFAIU th
Hi,
I just was curious to know if closures in apple gcc(called blocks from
what I read) is
also in mainline.
What is the status about this extension ?
Thanks
; lot
>> of things that were aligned to an (odd/even) multiple of 8 may now be
>> aligned
>> to an (even/odd) multiple instead.
>
> Also the message thread started by :
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2009-03/msg00107.html
>
> could be checked... Although takin
ery
new ms derived platform
or reference files in i386 folder.
i386-w32 (win32)
i386-w64 (win64)
i386-wce (wince)
arm-wce (arm-wince-pe)
mips-wce(mips-wince-pe)
What do you think ?
Vincent R.
Hi,
Sorry to cross-post but I don't have any answer on gcc-help.
When implementing seh for arm(arm-wince-pe) we have a weird assembler
message when
declaring ASM_DECLARE_FUNCTION_NAME. This macro calls the
arm_seh_header_function and
if we are trying to directly access a new field (has_seh) from
On Fri, 03 Apr 2009 08:00:33 +0100, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Cary Coutant wrote:
>>> With SEH you can catch that kind of errors and that's why it's so
>>> interesting in embedded world
>>
>> That's also why SEH is a major pain for optimization. The compiler
>> would have to identify every instruction t
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 11:22:22 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor
wrote:
> "Vincent R." writes:
>
>>> gcc will do the right thing if you put statements in an exception
>>> region.
>>
>> Hum how gcc can do that kind of things, is it some kind of voodoo ?
>>
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 08:56:49 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor
wrote:
> "Vincent R." writes:
>
>> Yes I think I don't explain things very clearly, so what is important to
>> know is that the __except keyword
>> can be passed instructions(case 1) or directly a functi
On Wed, 01 Apr 2009 07:54:20 -0700, Ian Lance Taylor
wrote:
> "Vincent R." writes:
>
>> Now the question is can we declare a function with an eh region and will
>> it
>> construct prologue and epilogue ?
>
> The instructions are already in a function. W
e can pass directly a function so this time I suppose
we only need to declare it as
a eh_region. Could you confirm I am understanding well the purpose of
eh_region and tell us
if we are looking in the right direction.
Thanks
Vincent R.
On Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:51:50 +, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Vincent R. wrote:
>
>> vinc...@vincent-pc:~/projects$ arm-mingw32ce-gcc -std=gnu99 -save-temps
>> -I/home/vincent/local/wince/include -DNDEBUG -O3 -c cegcc-errno-bug.c
>> -DDLL_EXPORT -DPIC -o libeet_la-eet_lib.o
Hi,
I am testing a cross-compiler targetting arm-wince-pe and based on
gcc-trunk revision r144975 and when
compiling a project I get the following error :
vinc...@vincent-pc:~/projects$ arm-mingw32ce-gcc -std=gnu99 -save-temps
-I/home/vincent/local/wince/include -DNDEBUG -O3 -c cegcc-errno-bug.c
On Thu, 19 Mar 2009 19:58:13 +0200, Ozkan Sezer wrote:
> I'm a bit amazed that the prototype for VirtualProtect() is known to the
> compiler but the definition of DWORD is not.. In any case, it should be
> fixed easily by changing DWORD into unsigned int which is what a
> DWORD is always defined a
Hi,
I tried to generate a cross-compiler from trunk a few hours ago and I have
noticed that
libgcc2.c doesn't compile anymore because of the following function :
int
mprotect (char *addr, int len, int prot)
{
DWORD np, op;
if (prot == 7)
np = 0x40;
else if (prot == 5)
np = 0x20;
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:31:07 +, Dave Korn
wrote:
> Laurent GUERBY wrote:
>> On Tue, 2009-02-24 at 17:39 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
>>> And what if I want to debug a cross compiler, there is no cc1 or
cc1plus
>>> with the toolchain I use:
>>
>> Try
On Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:43:08 +0100, Richard Guenther
wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 24, 2009 at 4:38 PM, Vincent R.
> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> even if I am simple mortal I would like to understand or at least follow
>> what is going on with gcc.
>> Generally when I ru
Hi,
even if I am simple mortal I would like to understand or at least follow
what is going on with gcc.
Generally when I run gdb and try to breakpoint inside a function I get a
undefined symbol or something like that.
I suppose this is because gcc is not a simple static exe but depends on
other bi
is with
optimization because the code
just after goto shouldn't be discarded even if it appears to be stupid
because it cannot be executed.
Thanks
Vincent R.
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009 09:03:36 +1100, Carl wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 17, 2009 at 8:38 AM, Farlie A
> wrote:
>
>> In terms of Visual Basic code, there is of course no 'free' compiler for
>> VB
>> code written prior
>> to VB.NET., and again the EULA for the runtime support would prevent use
>> of
>> the
Hi,
I am comparing the assembly generated by compilers targeting arm-wince
platform and it seems
that cross-compiler from gcc-trunk is less optimized than an old one based
on gcc 4.1.x
Here is the comparison obtained from objdump:
cegcc-4.1.x :
00011000 :
11000: e92d40f0push
On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 09:16:10 +1100, Ben Elliston wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-01-26 at 14:19 +0100, Vincent R. wrote:
>
>> 1) When I compile bootstrap gcc, I am using make all-gcc and make
>> install-gcc and it seems it doesn't build libgcc anymore.
>
> I think that's
Hi,
I am still trying to generate a cross-compiler targeting wince-pe from
trunk.
Last time it seems nobody was able to answer so now I am going to ask
simpler questions :
1) When I compile bootstrap gcc, I am using make all-gcc and make
install-gcc and it seems it doesn't build libgcc anymore.
Hi,
I am trying to generate a cross-compiler targetting ARM wince plateform
from gcc trunk and I have an error message
when compiling mingw and regarding linker
My tree is organized like this :
src
+ binutils
+ gcc
+ mingw
+ w32api
+ build-mingw32ce
and I am using a script to build the differen
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:13:58 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor
wrote:
> "Vincent R." writes:
>
>> To locate appropriate handlers when an exception occurs in Win32
>> environments other than x86,
>
> Note that as far as I know, gcc only supports win32 for ARM and x8
On Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:37:20 -0800, Ian Lance Taylor
wrote:
> "Vincent R." writes:
>
>> I am working on a gcc-4.1.2 and I would like to know how the prologue
>> length from a function can be calculated.
>
> The question is not well formed. The instruction
Hi,
I am working on a gcc-4.1.2 and I would like to know how the prologue
length from a function can be calculated.
Indeed I am trying to evaluate what needs to be done to implement SEH and
one requirement is to be able to
fill a structure holding information like function length and prologue
leng
29 matches
Mail list logo
