On Sun, 18 Apr 2021 at 13:49, Richard Kenner wrote:
>
> > Depends on the use cases. Not in military surveillance. And certainly not
> > at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory. At Boeing could be the same, but
> > I'm not sure. Before 2011, rather than building things from scratch,
> > washi
On Sat, 17 Apr 2021 at 20:31, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> I do not see people really intending to fork. It explains why detractors
> have gone berserk.
I appreciate your colorful exaggerations, but I should point out that
the libstdc++
maintainer has stated his intention to fork, in unambigous t
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 19:01, Jason Merrill wrote:
>
> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 10:49 AM Christopher Dimech via Gcc
> wrote:
> > > Sent: Saturday, April 17, 2021 at 1:03 AM
> > > From: "Ville Voutilainen"
> > > To: "Christopher Dimech&
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 16:22, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> Many do not contribute because they do not have time, resources or support.
Yes? And? Even if GCC detaches itself from FSF, those who can contribute will
continue to contribute. And those who talk about contributing but
don't contribute
wi
On Fri, 16 Apr 2021 at 15:46, Christopher Dimech wrote:
> > The "small minority of developers" you speak of sure
> > seems to consist of developers who are not in the minority
> > considering how much they _actually contribute_ to the project.
>
> Due to their being paid for the work. Have no dou
Huge apologies for mis-sending this to gcc-patches,
my email client makes suggestions when I attempt
to send to a gcc list. :D
The actual suggestion is at the end; skip straight to it if you wish.
>Im glad there are people like you on the project Eric, because you express
exactly what a lot of pe
>However, the FSF does NOT control nor own the GNU project. That appears
to be a very common misperception.
>The FSF offers various pro-bono services to the GNU project, among them
guarding some GNU assets for the GNU project, but the GNU project is an
independent (unincorporated) organization, w
ite many other contributors to these projects, some far
more frequently active than me.
I am, Yours Most Sincerely,
Ville Voutilainen
an occasional libstdc++ contributor
a less-frequently occasional g++ contributor
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 11:54, Liu Hao via Libstdc++
wrote:
> As you can see, qualified names in C++ can grow up to ~100 characters quite
> frequently. This may
> deteriorate when `typename` and `template` are sometimes required. I don't
> think there is
> practically a set of rules which governs
On Fri, 27 Nov 2020 at 10:16, Richard Biener via Libstdc++
wrote:
> > Why not change this to:
> >
> > > if (present)
> > > ptr = gfc_build_conditional_assign_expr (
> > > block, present, ptr, nullarg);
> > >
> >
> > I think
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 19:46, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
wrote:
>
> On 22/09/20 12:25 -0400, Rich Felker wrote:
> >Is there really a reason to want a nonstandard macro like this to do
> >something that's already trivial to do in the base language and has a
> >standard idiom (sizeof x / sizeof *
On Tue, 22 Sep 2020 at 01:07, Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++
wrote:
> ># define array_length(arr)(std:size(arr))
>
> C++ programmers will not accept a macro for this.
..in other words, the C++17 version of it needs to be an inline
function that returns std::size of an array,
not a macro. All
On 19 April 2017 at 20:07, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> I know it's a bit late, but I'd like to propose deprecating the
> libstdc++ extension that allows arithmetic on std::atomic.
> Currently we make it behave like arithmetic on void*, which is also a
> GNU extension (https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/g
>> It's pending copyright paperwork from the author of the original patch.
>> (my copyright paperwork is in order, but since I didn't write all of it,
>> there's some crossing t's and dotting i's).
>Hmm, has he been contacted recently? The original patch was from ages
>ago...
>Thanks,
>-Miles
Jas
On 7 November 2011 03:58, Miles Bader wrote:
> Hi, I'm wondering whether there's been any progress on the recent
> "Delegating Constructors" patch:
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2011-09/msg01202.html
> The last post on that thread (in gcc-patches) was early last month.
> There doesn't seem t
15 matches
Mail list logo
