Re: Build reproducibility of gcc @ NixOS

2021-04-02 Thread Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc
Hi Arthur, On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 6:45 PM Arthur Gautier wrote: > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 4:32 PM Tadeus Prastowo > wrote: > > > > Hi Arthur, > > > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:04 PM Arthur Gautier > > wrote: > > > > > > Hi Tadeus, &

Re: Build reproducibility of gcc @ NixOS

2021-04-02 Thread Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc
Hi Arthur, On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:04 PM Arthur Gautier wrote: > > Hi Tadeus, > > On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 9:07 AM Tadeus Prastowo > wrote: [...] > > Since an optimized build is likely to be machine-dependent regardless > > of any intended injection (e.g., differe

Re: Build reproducibility of gcc @ NixOS

2021-04-02 Thread Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc
Hi Arthur, On Fri, Apr 2, 2021 at 5:56 AM Arthur Gautier wrote: > > Dear GCC development team, > > We've been trying to build reproducibly the minimal NixOS image, and > gcc was one of the last issues we had. > We found that disabling profiled bootstrap compilation of GCC allowed > us to get a re

Re: How to pack small type to big type without memory load/store ?

2020-08-03 Thread Tadeus Prastowo via Gcc
On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:10 AM Jojo R wrote: > > Hi, > > Form My ABI, float register is used by function call, > I want to pack float a and b into double v without any memory load/store, > > The flowing is my demo: > > Typedef union { > float ff[2]; > double v; > } double_u; > > Do

Re: C2X Proposal, merge '.' and '->' C operators

2019-12-27 Thread Tadeus Prastowo
On Fri, Dec 27, 2019 at 7:23 AM J Decker wrote: > would you suggest I go? It doesn't look like C standards, unlike > es-discuss for ecma script, I couldn't find a open forum to discuss such > things... or even a github group like... https://github.com/tc39/proposals You can table the proposal at

Re: RFC: Deprecate libstdc++ Policy-Based Data Structures

2019-07-24 Thread Tadeus Prastowo
Hi, Knowing that Alex has stepped forward, I am interested in helping out in this matter as well if you think that will help. My experience in maintaining a C++ library can be seen at https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/tice -- Best regards, Tadeus On Tue, Jul 23, 2019 at 6:50 PM Alexander Ku

Re: GCC 9 web timeline dates incorrect?

2019-01-16 Thread Tadeus Prastowo
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 1:07 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:55 PM Tadeus Prastowo > wrote: [...] > > Ack for Stage 4's date. But, are you sure that Stage 3 should still > > be shown as below? > > > > GCC 9 Stage 3 (starts 2017-11

Re: GCC 9 web timeline dates incorrect?

2019-01-16 Thread Tadeus Prastowo
On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 12:52 PM Richard Biener wrote: > > On Wed, Jan 16, 2019 at 10:40 AM Tadeus Prastowo > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > On this link https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline, I see the following: > > > > GCC 9 Stage 1 (sta

GCC 9 web timeline dates incorrect?

2019-01-16 Thread Tadeus Prastowo
Hi, On this link https://gcc.gnu.org/develop.html#timeline, I see the following: GCC 9 Stage 1 (starts 2018-04-25) GCC 8.1 release (2018-05-02) | \ |v | GCC 8.2 release (2018-07-26) GCC 9 S