Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs

On Mon, Apr 07, 2025 at 02:42:10PM +0800, Gwen Fu wrote: > Thanks for your reply ! > >The word "parameter" has very a specific meaning in Fortran. The > >entity that is passed into a function or subroutine is an "actual > >argument". The entity within the functions associated with the > >"actual ar

Re: GSoC[Fortran Runtime argument check ] Draft of Proposal and some doubts about the needs

On Sat, Apr 05, 2025 at 03:16:45PM +0800, Gwen Fu wrote: > My doubt : > 1.Does the compilation option only need to support fortran versions above > 9, o5r does it also need to support fortran 77? gfortran started life as a Fortran 95 compiler. It should support anything that is Fortran 95 or late

Re: Complex arithmetic in Fortran

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 05:33:20PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Am 13.11.24 um 15:55 schrieb Toon Moene: > > > > Since the Fortran 95 Standard it does (in the current Standard: 7.4.3.2 > > Real type): > > > > The real type includes a zero value. Processors that distinguish between > > positive a

Re: Building gcc with "-O -g"?

On Sat, Feb 10, 2024 at 07:35:22PM +0100, Marc Glisse wrote: > On Sat, 10 Feb 2024, Steve Kargl via Gcc wrote: > > > So, how does one biulding all parts of gcc with "-O -g"? > > > > In my shell script, I have > > > > CFLAGS="-O -g" > &g

Building gcc with "-O -g"?

So, how does one biulding all parts of gcc with "-O -g"? In my shell script, I have CFLAGS="-O -g" export CFLAGS CXXFLAGS="-O -g" export CXXFLAGS BOOT_CFLAGS="-O -g" export BOOT_CFLAGS ../gcc/configure --prefix=$HOME/work --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran \ --enable-bootstrap --disable-libssp

Re: Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master)

On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:38:02PM +0800, LIU Hao wrote: > 在 2023-01-31 21:13, Thomas Schwinge 写道: > > Hi! > > > > On 2023-01-30T14:50:08-0800, Steve Kargl via Fortran > > wrote: > > > Does the skull and crossbones convey anymore info than the rest of > > > the subject line > > > > > > Bui

Re: Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master)

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:07:46PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2023, Steve Kargl via Gcc wrote: > > Bingo. In the case of non-[a-zA-Z] characters in the > > Subject (or Fromi or To) line, the spam folder is normally > > named /dev/null. > > Hmm, so

Re: Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master)

On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 03:46:30PM +0100, Thomas Koenig wrote: > On 30.01.23 14:52, Mark Wielaard wrote: > > Hi Steve, > > > > On Sun, 2023-01-29 at 22:27 -0800, Steve Kargl via Gcc wrote: > > > Please remove the skull and cross bones in the subject line. > &

Re: ☠ Buildbot (Sourceware): gcc - failed configure (failure) (master)

On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 07:49:35PM +, Sam James via Fortran wrote: > > > > On 29 Jan 2023, at 19:36, Jerry D via Gcc wrote: > > > > I had this show up today. I have no idea what this is about. > > > > Please advise. > > > > Sorry Jerry, false positive -- something went wrong with > the b

Re: testsuite requires LTO?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 06:42:20PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On Tue, 12 Apr 2022 at 18:32, Steve Kargl wrote: > > Well, I determined what the problem is. On FreeBSD, > > GNU make is gmake. make(1) on FreeBSD is BSD make. > > > > % gmake -j7 check-c > > > > Does not pass down the name of the

Re: testsuite requires LTO?

On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 09:26:58AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote: > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 9:07 AM Richard Biener > wrote: > > > > On Tue, Apr 12, 2022 at 1:53 AM Steve Kargl via Gcc wrote: > > > > > > If I configure gcc with the following > > >

testsuite requires LTO?

If I configure gcc with the following ../gccx/configure --prefix=$HOME/work/x --enable-languages=c,c++,fortran \ --enable-bootstrap --disable-nls --enable-checking --disable-multilib \ --disable-libsanitizer --disable-lto. then bootstrap gcc, why do I see 1000s of failures with % cd gcc % gm