Re: WPP capabilities in gcc

2015-04-26 Thread Shoham Peller
tform * Will allow you to write arbitrary trace string * Parses the string and the parameters in it (%s, %d) and makes sure they are traced too. On Mon, Apr 27, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 26 April 2015 at 18:47, Shoham Peller wrote: >> 1. Can you think of a way to

Re: WPP capabilities in gcc

2015-04-26 Thread Shoham Peller
Is gcc meant to only be used to compile FOSS? If that's your agenda, you're right - I don't see how you can use a feature like WPP. But is that really what gcc aims for? Not to allow people working on close-source software to enjoy it? On Sun, Apr 26, 2015 at 10:58 PM, Richard Kenner wrote: >> W

Re: WPP capabilities in gcc

2015-04-26 Thread Shoham Peller
plementing a gcc plugin, but I think a lot of people can benefit from it being embedded in gcc, instead of having to import an .so file to enjoy this feature. 2. Do you think its a good feature for gcc, and will you (the maintainers) be willing to merge it, after we'll implement it? Thanks a

Re: WPP capabilities in gcc

2015-04-25 Thread Shoham Peller
Hi Guys, It's been 4 days. Can someone help me? I really want to get started on this project, if it's needed, and if it is, I think it'll give a very missed and needed feature to gcc. Thanks, Shoham On 04/22/2015 10:19 PM, Shoham Peller wrote: Hi, Me and a couple of friends

WPP capabilities in gcc

2015-04-22 Thread Shoham Peller
ay to hide traces in Linux applications? 2. If not, we would like to add this capability to gcc. Any thoughts of that? Is that something you would like to see in gcc? Thank you, Shoham Peller