On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 07:20:35AM -0400, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 04, 2023 at 22:19:32 +0100, Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc wrote:
> > The prototype that creates equivalent of the following commands does
> > work for smaller packages:
> >
> >
> &
On Thu, Oct 05, 2023 at 09:19:15AM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:20 PM Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi gcc developers!
> >
> > Tl;DR:
> >
> > I would like to implement a scalable way to pass `-fmacro-prefix-m
Hi gcc developers!
Tl;DR:
I would like to implement a scalable way to pass `-fmacro-prefix-map=`
for `NixOS` distribution to avoid leaking build-time paths generated by
`__FILE__` macros used by various libraries.
I need some guidance what path to take to be acceptable for `gcc`
upstream.
I hav
On Sat, 28 Mar 2020 11:35:36 +0100
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> On Mär 28 2020, Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc wrote:
>
> > x86_64-linux-musl targets do not support multilib layout as-is
> > and usually expects libdir=lib. glibc target usually uses libdir=lib64.
>
> If x
x86_64-linux-musl targets do not support multilib layout as-is
and usually expects libdir=lib. glibc target usually uses libdir=lib64.
In https://bugs.gentoo.org/675954 (also touched on https://gcc.gnu.org/PR90077)
Gentoo discovered the following discrepancy when gcc is built with
--disable-multi
On Thu, 26 Mar 2020 22:43:37 +
Joseph Myers wrote:
> On Thu, 26 Mar 2020, Sergei Trofimovich via Gcc wrote:
>
> > Hi all!
> >
> > Recently I attempted to build glibc-2.31 with --enable-static-pie
> > (gcc-9.3.0).
> > Some targets work just fine, some
Hi all!
Recently I attempted to build glibc-2.31 with --enable-static-pie (gcc-9.3.0).
Some targets work just fine, some don't. A few faulty ones so far are:
- alpha-unknown-linux-gnu
- hppa-unknown-linux-gnu
- hppa2.0-unknown-linux-gnu
- m68k-unknown-linux-gnu
- sparc-unknown-linux-gnu
- sparc64
