On 07/giu/2006, at 18:22, H. J. Lu wrote:
The x86 psABI is very old and doesn't cover XMM registers. I'd like to
update x86 Linux calling convention for XMM register usage. I am not
sure if I should update stack alignment requirement.
Maybe you'll want to check how this is handled in Darwin/x
t the patch should be applied to every maintained branch.
Please maintainers, check this in!
Cheers,
Sandro Tolaini
Finally, I managed to fix up libffi and run testing on libjava under
Darwin/i386.
Here is the libffi testsuite output:
Test Run By sandro on Sun Mar 26 10:49:37 2006
Native configuration is i386-apple-darwin8.5.2
=== libffi tests ===
Schedule of variations:
unix
Running
On 24/mar/2006, at 14:24, Andrew Pinski wrote:
This looks like you did not update your cctools to the newest one
which
was posted which includes this symbol.
Updated cctools, now the not found symbol has changed:
dyld: _dyld_bind_fully_image_containing_address() error
dyld: Symbol not foun
This has been discussed and patched on the gc mailing list. I think
that incorporating the patch is mandatory for all the 4.x branches:
http://www.hpl.hp.com/hosted/linux/mail-archives/gc/2005-December/
001071.html
Cheers,
Sandro
On 24/mar/2006, at 10:50, Sandro Tolaini wrote:
I'm attaching the patch against a current svn checkout.
Forgot to say that boehm-gc needs to be upgraded to 6.7. I've not
included patches for this, simply import it from the original
distribution.
Cheers,
Sandro
I have successfully forward ported libffi changes from 4.0 to 4.2,
but I have some problems running the testsuite. Here are the results:
# of expected passes1052
# of unexpected failures8
# of unsupported tests 8
Looking at the failures, I have:
FAIL: libffi.call/
On 17/mar/2006, at 00:57, Andrew Pinski wrote:
Actually it looks like libffi is still not working as you no longer
have eh info for x86-darwin. This is why all the gij tests fail.
I have implemented EH for Darwin/x86 and now much more tests pass:
Test Run By sandro on Sun Mar 19 10:12:14 20
On 11/mar/2006, at 02:09, Tom Tromey wrote:
Yes, one of the test cases in the libjava test suite checks this.
Offhand I forget which one... but if you do a 'make check' and send
the list of FAILs we can help analyze them. (This would be better
done on the gcj list, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
This is
On 10/mar/2006, at 20:42, Tom Tromey wrote:
libffi and mudflap were covered by Paolo and Andrew.
I have done some work on sysv.S and now libffi compiles fine on OSX/
Intel. Unfortunately, I had to put some #ifdef __APPLE__ this file
because Apple ships an old cctools with as that doesn't u
Hi everyone, I would like to port gcj/libgcj to i386-darwin. Is there
someone already working on that?
Considering that powerpc-darwin is a supported platform, it should
not prove to be too hard. However, I need some hints on how to
proceed. At configure phase, GCC woes for:
target-libmud
11 matches
Mail list logo
