> Yes, but you have to be careful, with a license statement like
> the above, you probably have to adopt a chinese wall strategy,
> i.e. anyone who has seen the run time library that is so
> licensed should not be allowed to work on the implementation of
> the replacement.
David send me a more exp
2005/11/13, Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> There is a GCC front end, but it has zero chance of being integrated
> into FSF GCC at this stage. The run-time library license contains
> this little gem:
>
> * (ii) Any derived versions of this software (howsoever
> modified)
> *
Hi!
I read some documentation about D programming language and began to
test few .d files/modules. I think the D language is promising, and
even if it has a garbage collector, it seems to be a good alternative
in front of Java and .Net languages since it implements everything
that quite every deve
