Hi,
I was wondering if anyone could help me make sense of the
more_specialized_fn() function in pt.c (line 13281).
Specifically, I am trying to understand what each of the are:
tree decl1 = DECL_TEMPLATE_RESULT (pat1);
tree targs1 = make_tree_vec (DECL_NTPARMS (pat1));
tree tparms1 = DECL_
iadic parameter
Any advice you can offer is greatly appreciated.
Rob Quill
ry to include a .c file at all?
Thanks for your help.
Rob Quill
On 06/04/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 11:38:50AM +0100, Rob Quill wrote:
> So the general concensus is that's it's not worth doing?
> Hypothetically, if I did it and it didn't make much difference, would
> it be worth submitting
pile-time
constant value) were started before n, i wouldn't even consider that to be a
bug... I would
consider it a marvel of intelligence in the compiler.
How so?
Rob
- Original Message
From: Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Rob Quill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: GCC Deve
So the general concensus is that's it's not worth doing?
Hypothetically, if I did it and it didn't make much difference, would
it be worth submitting a patch? Or should I just give up before I
start?
Rob
On 06/04/07, Daniel Jacobowitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:46:18A
On 05/04/07, Joe Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 02:37:06PM +0100, Rob Quill wrote:
> My problem is thus: When using GDB do debug the follow bit of code:
>
> int i = 0;
> int j = 2;
> int k = 3;
>
> If I set a breakpoint at the 3rd line,
Hi,
I wrote an email about this a while ago, but it was rather consice and
didn't explain the problem well.
My problem is thus: When using GDB do debug the follow bit of code:
int i = 0;
int j = 2;
int k = 3;
If I set a breakpoint at the 3rd line, before int k = 3; has been
executed, and check
Hi,
I am considering trying to add DW_AT_start_scope attributes to the
debug info emmited by GCC, so it can be used by GDB. I just wanted to
know what people think about this, and how difficult it is likely to
be?
Thanks for your time.
Rob
On 24/11/06, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Quill wrote:
> On 24/11/06, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Rob Quill wrote:
>> > I haven't looked into this yet, but as I think I may need to be able
>> > to do something similar,
On 24/11/06, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Quill wrote:
> I haven't looked into this yet, but as I think I may need to be able
> to do something similar, is it possible to parse the cfg file that is
> given out, and build a C structure like that?
It seems t
I haven't looked into this yet, but as I think I may need to be able
to do something similar, is it possible to parse the cfg file that is
given out, and build a C structure like that?
Thanks
Rob
On 21/11/06, Paolo Bonzini <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> but i don't know how to load that file in
) defined in cfg.c to output the pred and succ of
each block. You can use this output to construct the CFG.
Maybe the software graphviz can help you to visualize the CFG.
On 10/16/06, Rob Quill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does anyone know if it is possible to view/access
Hi,
Does anyone know if it is possible to view/access/print out the
control flow graphs produced by GCC, either at compilation time, or
after compilation has taken place?
Thanks for your time.
Rob
14 matches
Mail list logo
