affected probably.
Thanks, Peter
Please CC to me, not on list.
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
__stack_chk_fail)
This would cover the non-glibc version.
I have no idea how to check in TLS if __stack_chk_guard is there.
Thanks, Peter
PS: please CC to me.
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
Hello!
Checking the linux configs for different archs only arm has
%{symbolic:-Bsymbolic} for linking.
Is arm out of date, or should the others been updated?
Thanks, Peter
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
Hello!
patch for m68k to handle PIC as the other archs
Please apply, thx, Peter
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
--- gcc-4.0.2/gcc/config/m68k/linux.h.mps 2006-01-08 23:02:06 +0100
+++ gcc-4.0.2/gcc/config
On Mon, 9 Jan 2006, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 02:38:17PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > for HAVE_ENDFILE_MATH and HAVE_NOSTARTFILE_STATIC another possibility
> > would be
> > %{static:%:if-exists-else(crtbeginT.o%s crtbegin.o%s)}
> >
-math|funsafe-math-optimizations:%:if-exists(crtfastmath.o%s)}
Thanks, Peter
PS: please CC to me, not on ml.
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
--- gcc-4.1/gcc/config/alpha/elf.h.startend~2005-09-05 15:42:35
On Thu, 17 Nov 2005, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:32:45PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > what happens w/ -fstack-protector-all -fstack-protector (in this order) ?
> > > do we have
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:32:45PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > what happens w/ -fstack-protector-all -fstack-protector (in this order) ?
> > do we have (2) or (1)
>
> We have 1.
>
> > so now it does
> >
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 10:02:23PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:40:11PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > On Wed,
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 16, 2005 at 08:40:11PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
> >
> > > On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:01:21PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > I meant e
On Wed, 16 Nov 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2005 at 09:01:21PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > I meant exactly this, gcc supports -fno-stack-protector (although gcc
> > defaults to no-ssp), so -fno-stack-protector-all should be there too
>
> Why?
On Tue, 15 Nov 2005, James E Wilson wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-11-14 at 22:45, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > I have really hoped that someone here can duplicate it in any environment
>
> In that case, I'd suggest creating a bugzilla bug report. The gcc list
> is really more
for
-fstack-protector-all it won't link against libssp.so
Thanks, Peter
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
> ;; maps to SIGILL makes it more likely the program will rightfully die.
> ;; Keeping with tradition, "6" is in honor of #UD.
>
> So you may be seeing something mapped odd, or...
>
> -eric
>
>
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
On Mon, 14 Nov 2005, Jim Wilson wrote:
> Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > -fno-stack-protector-all is not recognised/implemented
>
> You could just submit this as a bug report into bugzilla.
>
> > apps built w/ -fstack-protector-all segfault
>
> You will have t
gnize
__stack_chk_guard in uClibc
Peter
PS: please CC to me, not on list, thanks
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
On Mon, 5 Sep 2005, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Sep 5, 2005, at 11:35 AM, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
>
> > Hello!
> >
> > libssp subdir is present in cvs (checked on savannah) but cvs -q upd
> > does
> > not get it. Is it a cvs-server failure or something o
Hello!
libssp subdir is present in cvs (checked on savannah) but cvs -q upd does
not get it. Is it a cvs-server failure or something on my side?
Thanks, Peter
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > the sequence used for linking on x86 (but most archs will have it too)
> > -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed -lc -lgcc --as-needed
mbols will be found in -lgcc.
Thanks, Peter
Please CC to me, not on list.
--
Peter S. MazingerID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
On Thu, 12 May 2005, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 08:13:27AM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > On Wed, 11 May 2005, H. J. Lu wrote:
> >
> > > On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:48:46AM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > Hello!
> >
On Wed, 11 May 2005, H. J. Lu wrote:
> On Thu, May 12, 2005 at 12:48:46AM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > Hello!
> >
> > I have gotten under peculiar circumstances following:
> > (sysvinit) init.o: relocation R_386_GOTOFF against protected function
> > `ma
22 matches
Mail list logo
