On Tue, 2006-08-15 at 10:06 -0700, Joe Buck wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:38:38PM -0400, Pavel Roskin wrote:
> > On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 22:44 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> > > Try -Werror-implicit-function-declaration. Not the same, but pretty
> > > close.
> &g
On Mon, 2006-08-14 at 22:44 +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Pavel Roskin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > I don't know much about gcc implementation, but if it's not hard to
> > check the context of the function call (or, alternatively, the
> > provenance
rent size).
I don't know much about gcc implementation, but if it's not hard to
check the context of the function call (or, alternatively, the
provenance of the integer that is about to be cast to a pointer), I'll
appreciate if this case is promoted to an error, and least for 64-bit
targets.
--
Regards,
Pavel Roskin
