ok, I've created PR31937 related to the libffi bug and I've also
submitted a quick patch to the gcc-patches mailing list
Patrick
On 5/16/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 15, 2007, at 2:20 AM, Patrick Olinet wrote:
> Finally, I've tried it the dirty w
.
Any thoughts about that ?
And should I report a new bug for this libffi/powerpc problem ?
And thanks again to all of you for your help.
Patrick
On 5/14/07, Mike Stump <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 8:46 AM, Patrick Olinet wrote:
> Running with gdb, it looks like the prob
> I thought that fpu emulation worked by trapping cpu exceptions when a
> fpu instruction is being executed and then emulating this instruction
> on software level.
Yes.
> Isn't the mechanism implemented by the "--with-float=soft" option ?
No. FPU emulation requires no special compile-time
> I've compiled again my cross toolchain with the "--with-float=soft"
> option, hoping that it would emulate FPU instruction, but this
> unfortunately doesn't help... I'm nevertheless not sure that this
> option is the right one...
If your entire toolchain is compiled with --with-float=soft, then
#x27;m nevertheless not sure that this
option is the right one...
Any thoughts ? Is there a bug in libffi in that it doesn't support
powerpc CPU without FPU ?
Regards,
Patrick
On 5/8/07, Andrew Haley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Patrick Olinet writes:
> Hi there,
>
> I'
compiled with the right
EABI (does this question make sense??) ?
Any ideas or thoughts about this problem ?
Thanks in advance for your replies.
Regards,
Patrick Olinet
