Re: git.infradead.org missing most GCC SVN branches?

On 6 Jul 2008, Daniel Berlin spake thusly: > gcc.gnu.org/git/gcc.git tracks all branches. Updating now, thank you :) an official GCC git repo, whoo! > Just remember to tell it to fetch all remote refs (since git-svn > branches are done as remotes) That's the default for `git remote add', I thin

git.infradead.org missing most GCC SVN branches?

[David, my fallible memory says that you operate this incredibly useful service: if not, feel free to ignore it / tell me who does / forward it on.] I just had reason to want to look at the 4.3 branch (as opposed to HEAD as usual) and found that the git mirror on git.infradead.org isn't tracking

Re: Git and GCC

On 8 Dec 2007, Johannes Schindelin said: > Hi, > > On Sat, 8 Dec 2007, J.C. Pizarro wrote: > >> On 2007/12/07, "Linus Torvalds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> > SHA1 is almost totally insignificant on x86. It hardly shows up. But >> > we have a good optimized version there. >> >> If SHA1 is sl

Re: C++ man pages?

On Sun, 23 Apr 2006, Joe Buck prattled cheerily: > >> On 20 Apr 2006, Joe Buck moaned: >> > There is online documentation at >> > >> > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/libstdc++/documentation.html >> > >> > It doesn't exist in "ma

Re: C++ man pages?

On 20 Apr 2006, Joe Buck moaned: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 03:09:16PM -0400, Philip Goetz wrote: >> I know this is such a basic question, but I've been through dozens of >> websites and several FAQs without finding an answer... >> >> Where can I get C++ language man pages for use with gcc? Not th

Re: Problem with gfortran or did I messsed up GMP installation?

On 13 Jan 2006, Eric Botcazou mused: >> GMP is used by the compiler, not by the application, so you only need >> the version that the compiler will use. > > Right, that's what I previously said. :-) But Aleksandar apparently insists > on having both versions installed. Doesn't Solaris have an e

Re: config.cache question

On 13 Jan 2006, Ben Elliston uttered the following: >> I apologize if this question has already been answered but I would >> like to know if there is a way to reuse the same config.cache file >> for all the builds of all the subdirectories of a bootstrap ? > > It should be possible, but the config

Re: Missing GNAT docs

On 10 Jan 2006, Jonathan Wakely uttered the following: > I can't help to put the 3.4.5 docs there, but the 3.4.4 docs are > available, just change the 5 in the broken URLs to a 4. > > I don't know for certain, but I doubt the changes were very significant. A brief `svn diff' shows that there were

Re: default cflags to compile

On 8 Dec 2005, Nuno Lopes gibbered uncontrollably: > I need to generate a gcc binary that will always enable the > -fabi-version=1, because I have a library built with gcc 3.3 and I > need to link with it, but I would like to use gcc 4. The libstdc++ ABI broke between these releases, so unless you

Re: A couple more subversion notes

On 19 Oct 2005, Giovanni Bajo yowled: > Andreas Schwab <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >>> If I remove the socket file, it just does a normal connection. >> >> It doesn't for me. >> >> $ ssh gcc.gnu.org >> Couldn't connect to /var/tmp/schwab/ssh_%h: No such file or directory > > Ah, maybe it's a l

Re: Some svn numbers

On 12 Oct 2005, Daniel Berlin murmured woefully: > (I'd recommend a 1.2.x client, or 1.3.x in a few weeks. 1.2.x has much > fsater working copy than 1.2.x) So this is some sort of Zen version control, is it? :) (I assume you mean that 1.2.x is much faster than 1.1.x, and 1.3.x is a little faster

Re: New port contribution - picoChip

On 12 Sep 2005, Steven Bosscher gibbered uncontrollably: > I think people should object. What is the point in having a free > software compiler if e.g. users can't use a complete free toolchain; > or gcc developers not being able to test changes when some patch > needs changes in every port. Well

Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows

On 29 Aug 2005, Gerald Pfeifer said: > On Fri, 26 Aug 2005, Nix wrote: >> --enable-version-specific-runtime-libs and >> --program-{prefix,suffix,transform-name} and make slight adjustments >> after installation (ditch libiberty.a and some locale and manpage stuff >>

Re: Cross Compiler Unix - Windows

On 26 Aug 2005, Kai Ruottu complained: >Not even mentioning Linux and its GCC idea: "There can > be only one!", seemingly borrowed from the "Highlander" -- that all the > GCCs on a host system should use a common $prefix has seemingly been > totally unknown by the Linux people and t

Re: What systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked?

On 14 Aug 2005, Zack Weinberg yowled: > Kaveh R. Ghazi said: >> Hmm I'm curious, what systems (if any) have fprintf_unlocked? > > At the time I thought glibc had it, but I don't see it on my (2.3.5) > system now. It doesn't appear in the changelogs either. Is it possible you got confused with fp

Re: PATCH: Enable FTZ/DAZ for SSE via fast math

On 10 Aug 2005, H. J. Lu said: > + /* SSE is the part of 64bit. Only need to check it for 32bit. */ Grammar nit: this should probably be + /* All 64-bit targets have SSE; only check it explicitly for 32-bit ones. */ or something like that. > + : "i" (0x0020)); > + if (((eax

Re: does -fstack-protector work for gcc 4.1 on Darwin 8?

On 4 Aug 2005, Richard Henderson whispered secretively: > On Wed, Aug 03, 2005 at 09:39:13PM -0400, Jack Howarth wrote: >> Do you think I should be able to build gcc itself with the >> -fstack-protector flag and what is the most appropriate way to >> achieve that (ie brute force using a CFLAG o

Re: Large, modular C++ application performance ...

On 29 Jul 2005, Florian Weimer announced authoritatively: > * michael meeks: > >> I've been doing a little thinking about how to improve OO.o startup >> performance recently; and - well, relocation processing happens to be >> the single, biggest thing that most tools flag. > > Have you tried

Re: (SOLVED) Re: GCC 4.0.1 testsuite uses installed g++ instead of newly bootstrapped g++

On 28 Jul 2005, Joe Buck announced authoritatively: > Glad you found this. Your experience is why I've always objected when > someone suggests a .gccrc or a GCC_OPTIONS environment variable or the > like; people will forget that they have such files and report > unreproducible bugs. Instead, peop

Re: duplicate -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed

On 2 Jun 2005, Peter S. Mazinger murmured: > On Thu, 2 Jun 2005, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > >> On Thu, Jun 02, 2005 at 01:59:46PM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote: >> > Hello! >> > >> > the sequence used for linking on x86 (but most archs will have it too) >> > -lgcc --as-needed -lgcc_s --no-as-needed

Re: some question about gc

[Disclaimer: the transition to GC happened around the time I started paying attention to GCC, so my knowledge of the pre-GC situation may be inaccurate.] On 16 May 2005, zouq suggested tentatively: > and now i am thinking that why use garbage collection in gcc, > is it because of its high effici

Re: Packing booleans?

On 4 May 2005, Sam Lauber stipulated: > Would it be possible to have a -fpack-bools option that packs booleans into > the smallest form possible (8 booleans -> 1 8-bit reg, etc.) into a register > (or memory, as the case may be)? How could you do that without breaking the semantics of the program?

Re: GCC 4.1: Buildable on GHz machines only?

On 30 Apr 2005, Giovanni Bajo uttered the following: > There is no outcome, because it is just the Nth legend. Like people say "I > believe GCC is slow because of pointer indirection" or stuff like that. Don't we have actual *evidence* that it's slow because of cache thrashing? -- `End users are

Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0

On Thu, 21 Apr 2005, John David Anglin said: > Yes, a total of more than 4GB has been allocated. However, most of > this memory has been freed. Thus, the total isn't particularly > informative. [insert moan about absence of xfree() to adjust count down here] -- This is like system("/usr/funky/

Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0

On Wed, 20 Apr 2005, Daniel Jacobowitz stipulated: > On Wed, Apr 20, 2005 at 08:16:22PM +0100, Nix wrote: >> On 14 Apr 2005, John David Anglin spake: >> >> : out of memory allocating 12016 bytes after a total of 4161654476 bytes >> > >> > You need to incr

Re: Problem compiling GCC 4.0 RC1 on powerpc-ibm-aix5.2.0.0

On 14 Apr 2005, John David Anglin spake: >> : build/genattrtab >> /home/kate/gcc-4.0.0-20050410/src/gcc-4.0.0-20050410/gcc/config/rs6000/ >> rs6000.md > tmp-attrtab.c >> : >> : out of memory allocating 12016 bytes after a total of 4161654476 bytes > > You need to increase the application limits

Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level

[Cc: list drastically trimmed.] On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki spake: > On 2005-04-05, at 01:28, Nix wrote: >> On 4 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki stipulated: >>> I don't agree with the argument presented by Geert Bosch. It's even more >>> difficult to >>

Re: RFC: #pragma optimization_level

On 4 Apr 2005, Marcin Dalecki stipulated: > I don't agree with the argument presented by Geert Bosch. It's even more > difficult to > muddle through the atrocities of autoconf/automake to find the places where > compiler > switches get set in huge software projects What's so hard about find . \

Re: Hand-written rec-descent parser of GCC-4.1 is WRONG!!!.

On 16 Mar 2005, Joe Buck stated: > On Wed, Mar 16, 2005 at 02:41:12AM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >> Writing Hand-written recursive-descent parser miss-cleans the source code >> and goes hardfully to maintain it!!! > > Not if you know how to write one correctly. ... and I must say that Mark's

Re: How does g++ implement error handling?

On 22 Feb 2005, Aaron W. LaFramboise murmured woefully: > I'm also interested in any overview-level information about the Dwarf2 > unwinding mechanism. Aldy Hernandez wrote one: . -- > ...Hires Root Beer... What we need these days is a stable, fas

Re: Accessing the subversion repository

On 17 Feb 2005, Marc Espie said: > No need for fsh or anything. Didn't this feature make it into portable > openssh ? Yes, it did, but as usual with OpenSSH entirely without documentation other than a changelog entry and silent change to the manpage describing the extra options but not how to use

Re: License text irregularity in gcc/config/mips/linux-unwind.h

On 11 Feb 2005, Sam Lauber mused: > As for the exception missing, it should be kept that way. As libgcc is linked against every program linked using the GCC driver, and is required by code generated with GCC, this would make it illegal to distribute any non-GPL software built with GCC. This is