On Wed, May 21, 2025, 05:27 Jonathan Wakely via Gcc wrote:
> On Wed, 21 May 2025 at 09:27, Homam Alkhateeb wrote:
> > I hope this message finds you well. I am writing to request the removal
> of personal information from all relevant messages that I posted on the
> gcc.gnu.org mailing list.
> >
>
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 23:53 vspefs wrote:
> By the way, what's stop us from having compiler options like
> `g++ -Rgcm.cache -Rsomewhere/else/gcm.cache` to specify CMI repo path,
> like `-I`
> for include paths? It could be useful for projects with complex folder
> structure, as build tools like
On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 21:39 vspefs via Gcc wrote:
> Current `-Mmodules` output is based on [P1602R0](wg21.link/p1602r0), which
> speaks about a set of Makefile rules that can handle modules, with the
> help of
> module mappers and a modified GNU Make.
>
> The proposal came out in 2019, and the
On Mon, Jan 22, 2024, 12:31 Arthur Cohen wrote:
> I am aware that this would mean restricting the Rust
> GCC front-end to platforms where the official Rust compiler is also
> available, which is less than ideal. However, this would only be
> temporary - as soon as the Rust front-end is able to co
On Thu, Jan 25, 2024, 11:27 Iain Sandoe wrote:
> E.g. with Ada it is possible to port to a new platform by first building a
> cross-compiler and then to use that cross-compiler to build a “native
> cross” (build != host == target) to provide an initial compiler on the
> target platform.
>
And th
On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 5:41 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 27, 2023 at 11:35:23AM +0200, Helmut Zeisel wrote:
> > >Von: "Jakub Jelinek"
> > >An: "Helmut Zeisel"
> > >Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org
> > >Betreff: Re: GCC 13.1 compile error when using CXXFLAGS=-std=c++20
> > >On Thu, Apr 27,
On Tue, Feb 14, 2023 at 6:20 PM Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
> Alas http://www.wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor has been down for a while,
> and there does not appear to be a new location?
https://wlandry.net/Projects/FTensor/ works
On Sat, Feb 11, 2023, 14:37 Basile Starynkevitch
wrote:
> Modifying the pass manager
> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gccint/Pass-manager.html#Pass-manager to
> use clock_gettime system call. See
> https://man7.org/linux/man-pages/man2/clock_gettime.2.html
Since we can now use c++11, std::chron
On Sun, Jan 29, 2023 at 2:37 PM Jerry D via Fortran wrote:
>
> I had this show up today. I have no idea what this is about.
>
> Please advise.
I assume the buildbot thinks that
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=8011fbba7baa46947341ca8069b5a327163a68d5
broke the build, but I fail to se
On Tue, Jan 10, 2023 at 9:30 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > [...]
> > I did another little test to try to better understand your point. I
> > ran a linux native testsuite under a simulator that just sets SIM to "
> > ". This resulted in extra ^M's also, although many tests
On Thu, Jan 5, 2023 at 10:33 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:00 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >
> >> NightStrike wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:37 PM Jacob Bachmeyer
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> [...]
> >>> So at least we know for sure th
On Fri, Dec 23, 2022 at 11:00 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:37 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >> NightStrike wrote:
> >>
> >>> [...]
> >>> Second, the problems with extra \r's still remain, but I think we've
> >>> generally come to think that that part
On Wed, Dec 28, 2022, 00:37 Alexander Zaitsev wrote:
> Hello.
>
> We are using GCC for our C++ projects. Our projects are huge, commit
> rate is quite huge, so our CI workers are always busy (so as any other
> CI workers, honestly). Since we want to increase build speed, one of the
> option is to
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 11:37 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > [...]
> > Second, the problems with extra \r's still remain, but I think we've
> > generally come to think that that part isn't Wine and is instead
> > either the testsuite or deja. So I'll keep those replies to Ja
On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 12:38 PM Jacek Caban wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
>
> I'm responsible for Wine changes that cause your problems. I'm also
> CCing Eric, who is Wine console expert, maybe he has better ideas. Eric,
> see [1] if you're interested in the context.
>
>
> Recent Wine versions implement W
On Sun, Dec 18, 2022 at 11:29 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 10:44 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
> >
> >> [...]
> >> This is either a testsuite problem or an environment problem. The GNU
> >> Fortran I/O module certainly has interesting behavior here. T
On Mon, Dec 19, 2022 at 5:43 AM Torbjorn SVENSSON
wrote:
> I'm not sure if this helps anyone, but I experienced something similar with
> Cygwin a while back.
> What I had to do in order to have expect working when testing GCC on Windows
> 10 was to defined the "CYGWIN" environment variable to "d
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 10:44 PM Jacob Bachmeyer wrote:
>
> NightStrike wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 5:52 AM Thomas Koenig wrote:
> >
> >> On 17.12.22 01:26, NightStrike wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 1:44 AM Thomas Koenig
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> On 16.12.22 03:20, NightStrik
On Sat, Dec 17, 2022 at 5:52 AM Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> On 17.12.22 01:26, NightStrike wrote:
> > On Fri, Dec 16, 2022 at 1:44 AM Thomas Koenig wrote:
> >>
> >> On 16.12.22 03:20, NightStrike via Fortran wrote:
> >>
> >>> When I run the testsuite under wine, I'm getting a lot of ANSI escape
> >>
On Fri, Nov 25, 2022 at 3:09 PM Paul Koning via Gcc wrote:
> But in any case, how does that relate to the error messages I got? They
> don't seem to have anything to do with missing compilers, but rather with the
> use of language features too new for the available (downloadable) Gnat.
General
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 10:49 David Brown wrote:
>
>
> On 14/11/2022 16:10, NightStrike wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 04:42 David Brown via Gcc
> >
> > Warnings are not perfect - there is always the risk of false
> positives
> > and false negatives. And different people will ha
On Mon, Nov 14, 2022, 04:42 David Brown via Gcc wrote:
> On 13/11/2022 19:43, Alejandro Colomar via Gcc wrote:
> > Hi Andrew!
> >
> > On 11/13/22 19:41, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> >> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:40 AM Andrew Pinski
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Sun, Nov 13, 2022 at 10:36 AM Alejandro Coloma
On Sun, Sep 11, 2022, 10:30 Junk Trash via Gcc wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I want to get the opinions of GCC developers regarding adding CMake as a
> build system for GCC. Is it something you would like, something you are
> neutral about, or something you are strongly against?
>
> Thanks for your valuable f
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 11:45 AM Martin Sebor via Gcc wrote:
> ice-on-invalid-code: ICE on code that is not syntactically valid.
> ice-on-valid-code: ICE on code that is syntactically valid.
Presumably, the distinction is there because more attention would get
paid to the latter over the former.
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 10:21 PM Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
> On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 6:39 PM NightStrike via Gcc wrote:
> > On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 07:16 NightStrike wrote:
> >
> > > When porting to GCC 11, care must be taken to adjust includes of GCC
> > >
On Tue, Aug 24, 2021 at 8:48 AM David Malcolm wrote:
> Thanks for working through the above.
>
> Do you have an account in GCC's bugzilla? If so, please can you turn
> this into a bug report there. Is there a recipe for testing this via
> wine? (it's been almost 20 years since I did any Windows
Should I make this a bugzilla? I guess I figured that wouldn't be
appropriate.
On Mon, Aug 9, 2021, 07:16 NightStrike wrote:
> When porting to GCC 11, care must be taken to adjust includes of GCC
> intrinsic headers due to this change:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
>
> T
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 8:16 PM NightStrike wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:09 PM David Malcolm wrote:
> > Which tests are failing, specifically?
Here's the full list of all 37 failures that fail for any reason:
FAIL: gcc.dg/analyzer/dot-output.c dg-check-dot dot-output.c.state-purge.dot
FAI
On Mon, Aug 23, 2021 at 4:09 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2021-08-23 at 09:52 -1000, NightStrike wrote:
> > David,
> >
> > Many of the analyzer tests fail on windows because they hardcode in
> > the
> > typedef of size_t to be unsigned long. This is not a platform
> > independent
> > defini
David,
Many of the analyzer tests fail on windows because they hardcode in the
typedef of size_t to be unsigned long. This is not a platform independent
definition, though, and is wrong for 64 bit windows. This causes extra
warnings that all of the functions using size_t arguments are wrong,
becau
When porting to GCC 11, care must be taken to adjust includes of GCC
intrinsic headers due to this change:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97148
That should be reflected in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/porting_to.html
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 07:36 Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> Hi NightStrike,
>
> On June 7, 2021 5:18:13 PM UTC, NightStrike wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 06:12 Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> >
> > > The Steering Committee can avoid all of this, now.
> > > I cannot really understand why they shouldn't.
> > >
> >
On Mon, Jun 7, 2021, 06:12 Giacomo Tesio wrote:
> The Steering Committee can avoid all of this, now.
> I cannot really understand why they shouldn't.
>
Likely because the primary contributor to c++ has said he will stop
contributing unless the change is made.
>
On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 7:23 AM Ville Voutilainen via Gcc
wrote:
> On the first part, other people have touched on it already,
> but the fear of a dreaded non-free software vendor co-opting
> GCC as a library to a non-free project has resulted in GCC
> being unsuitable to be used as a library in f
On Thu, Apr 15, 2021, 23:42 Iain Sandoe via Gcc wrote:
> it is essential (IMO) that review of code is carried out on a fair and
> technical basis without personal attack or harrassment (or
> unwelcome unrelated attention).
>
Is this not the case on gcc-patches?
>
On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:25 AM Jakub Jelinek via Gcc wrote:
> An -O? option is not just a set of suboptions it enables
Maybe it should be. I notice this come up often enough at least.
36 matches
Mail list logo
