On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 11:33 AM Fangrui Song wrote:
> >> (lld has a quite simple model where undefined non-weak and undefined
> >> weak symbols are handled in a unified way.
> >> A symbol is preemptible if:
> >>
> >> * -shared or at least one input file is DSO, and
> >> * the symbol is undefined
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 10:04 AM Fangrui Song wrote:
> I am intrigued by the problem but I have trouble understanding the
> description. What behavior does this patch change?
>
> > riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc test.c
> -Wl,--unresolved-symbols=ignore-in-object-files
>
> There is no -nostdlib, th
Committed, thanks.
Nelson
On Mon, Mar 3, 2025 at 11:51 AM Nelson Chu wrote:
> Looks like we could give it a try and see if it works and won't affect
> current projects. I will commit it before this weekend if there are no
> objections.
>
> Thanks
> Nelson
>
> On
Looks like we could give it a try and see if it works and won't affect
current projects. I will commit it before this weekend if there are no
objections.
Thanks
Nelson
On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 1:53 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Feb 2025 00:33:37 PST (-0800), Nelson Chu wrote:
&
I got an request about the undefined behaviors, considering the following case,
$ cat test.c
void main ()
{
foo();
}
$ cat lib.h
void foo(void);
$ riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu-gcc test.c
riscv64-unknown-linux-gnu/bin/ld: /tmp/ccRO8fJl.o: in function `main':
test.c:(.text+0x8): undefined reference t
