s in both a.C and b.C.
> >
> > Yes, but this is what I am concerned about. Without LTO at least when
> > compiling a.C with profile feedback we will have foo with 0 counts.
> > We might however work out that calls of foo are frequent and decide to
> > inline foo. We wil
e available here:
http://www.cgo.org/cgo2010/talks/
>
> Ciao!
> Steven
>
--
Neil Vachharajani
Google
650-214-1804
is it just that no one is interested in the issue?
> Jack
--
Neil Vachharajani
Google
650-214-1804
t; ===
>
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2009-08/msg00427.html
>
> The next report will be sent by me announcing Stage 3 begin.
>
> --
> Richard Guenther
> Novell / SUSE Labs
> SUSE LINUX Products GmbH - Nuernberg - AG Nuernberg - HRB 16746 - GF: Markus
> Rex
>
--
Neil Vachharajani
Google
650-214-1804
Mon, 2009-03-30 at 13:53 -0700, Neil Vachharajani wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm working on a patch which makes FDO profile data more robust to
>>> source changes. Before I sent the patch to the list for review, I was
>>> wondering how to write a tes
Hello,
I'm working on a patch which makes FDO profile data more robust to
source changes. Before I sent the patch to the list for review, I was
wondering how to write a test for this situation. In particular, what
I would like to have is two source files which are similar but not the
same. The
