e) not to do so.
Please let me know.
Warm regards,
Krishna.
On Tue, 20 Sep 2005, Mike Stump wrote:
# On Sep 19, 2005, at 10:36 PM, N V Krishna wrote:
# > When I try to compile something like:
# > foo(){
# > int a[] = {1,2};
# >
# >
# >
# > }
# >
# > gcc is combining t
Hi,
When I try to compile something like:
foo(){
int a[] = {1,2};
}
gcc is combining them into a double (DImode) and handling as such. Is
there a switch by which I can direct gcc not to do so? I am using gcc
2.95.2.
When the array has three elements this issues does not exist any mor
Avr-gcc has it's own list as well:
avr-gcc-list@nongnu.org
You can try there as well.
Krishna.
On Thu, 18 Aug 2005, Rikard S wrote:
# Where do I start?
# I guess there is only some few files that I need to write or edit,
# using files for similar MCU's as "templates".
#
# If I would like to imp
constant pool we can
get_pool_offset() would do that.
- Is there a corresponding function for pseudos present for locals?
Any help in this regards would be greatly appreciated. Thanks in Advance.
Warm regards,
N V Krishna.
One more thing I forgot to mention is that, I am working on a rather old
version of gcc - 2.95.2 for some reasons.
Krishna.
On Sat, 28 May 2005, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
#N V Krishna <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
#
#> I am trying to do some modifications to the register allocator an
Hello All,
I am trying to do some modifications to the register allocator and for the
architecture I am dealing with, I want to handle different type of pseudos
differently. All local scalars fall under one group, local struct/union
variables under one group and all globals under one group. Given a
