On 2019-01-18 3:45 a.m., Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2019 at 8:16 PM Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I've been doing some investigations that required using a bitmap to keep
>> track of decl IDs and I ran into segmentation fault a
to keep track of ids:
typedef int_hash unsigned_int_hasher;
static GTY(()) hash_set *all_ids;
But I couldn't figure out how to write the required gt_ggc_mx and gt_pch_nx
methods.
Any help would be greatly appreciated!
- Michael
From 6b410e862017a677095ae094244c87ca1bbe72fd Mon Sep 17 00:00
On 2018-12-05 2:38 p.m., Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to write a testcase to reproduce duplicate clone symbols
> such as in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297 I
> started with a testcase that is known to have constprop clones and
> split i
Hi,
I'm trying to write a testcase to reproduce duplicate clone symbols
such as in https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88297 I
started with a testcase that is known to have constprop clones and
split it into two object files:
bash-4.2# cat /gcc/src/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/lto/independent-c
On 2018-07-16 04:30 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 16, 2018 at 12:19 AM Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
>>
>> On 2018-07-04 04:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:09 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 07/03/2018 11:55 A
On 2018-07-04 04:52 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 9:09 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 07/03/2018 11:55 AM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>> On 2018-07-03 12:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>>> On July 3, 2018 4:56:57 PM GMT+02:00, Michael Ploujnik
On 2018-07-03 12:46 PM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On July 3, 2018 4:56:57 PM GMT+02:00, Michael Ploujnikov
> wrote:
>> On 2018-06-20 04:23 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:31 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 06/19/2018 12:30 PM
On 2018-06-20 04:23 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 7:31 AM Jeff Law wrote:
>>
>> On 06/19/2018 12:30 PM, Michael Ploujnikov wrote:
>>> Hi everyone,
>>>
>>> (I hope this is the right place to ask, if not my apologies; please
>&g
Hi everyone,
(I hope this is the right place to ask, if not my apologies; please
point me in the right direction)
I'm trying to get a better understanding of the following part in
tree_swap_operands_p():
/* It is preferable to swap two SSA_NAME to ensure a canonical form
for commutative a
