Hi,
We are pleased to announce the release of AspeCt-oriented C (ACC) V 0.6.
The ACC 0.6 release includes some experimental features and a new script
"tacc" for automatically integrating aspect-compilation in building
large C-based software projects.
For more details and download, please vis
Hi,
We are pleased to announce the release of AspeCt-oriented C (ACC) V
0.5, formerly known as AspectC.
Besides some new features, the ACC 0.5 release also includes a set of
experimental weave adapters that
help integrate aspeCts in the build process of large C-based software
projects.
For m
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Gong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "GERIN Patrice" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Jan Hubicka"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Saturday, February 1
Hi, Patrice,
I don't know about inserting call at the basic block level, but I am
quite sure inserting calls at the function level could be done by
aspect-oriented-programming (AOP).
For example, we used our project, AspectC compiler (www.aspectc.net), to
weave in following aspect into gcc,
The operand of the shift operator is of type unsigned int.
"x <<= c" is exactly the same as "((int)x) << c"
It doesn't matter whether the promotion is explicit or implicit, the
semantics
are the same.
According to C99, the operand of the shift operator should be "integer
type", which include
Yes. You are right.
- Original Message -
From: "Andreas Schwab" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael Gong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 12:08 PM
Subject: Re: preprocessing quest
One explanation could be:
- Original Message -
From: "Jan Beulich" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, September 25, 2006 11:23 AM
Subject: preprocessing question
Can anyone set me strait on why, in the following code fragment
int x(unsigned);
struct alt_x {
unsigned val;
};
#d
Yes. Gcc gives a warning under -pedantic.
gcc -pedantic foo.c
foo.c:3: warning: ISO C does not allow extra `;' outside of a function
It looks like an old C syntax.
Regards,
Michael
- Original Message -
From: "Andrew Pinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &
Hi,
I am wondering why following program is compiled successfully by gcc ?
Please notice there is a ";" after the function definition.
Is there a gcc extension for it ?
/* foo.c */
int main() {
printf("hello world\n");
} ;
Thanks.
Michael
