On 2/7/2018 4:15 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 7 February 2018 at 15:07, Manfred wrote:
On 02/07/2018 02:44 PM, Simon Marchi wrote:
[...]
This addresses the issue of how to do good software design in GDB to
support different producers cleanly, but I think we have some issues even
ight, currently the issue is that gcc emits two
types with the same debug identifier.
Regarding 3), I think that after 1) and 2) are set up, GDB should be
able to find the correct type definition (using the most appropriate
design choice).
Hope this helps,
Manfred
[1] According to the f
On 2/4/2018 6:01 AM, Simon Marchi wrote:
On 2018-02-03 13:35, Manfred wrote:
n4659 17.4 (Type equivalence) p1.3:
Two template-ids refer to the same class, function, or variable if
...
their corresponding non-type template arguments of integral or
enumeration type have identical values
n4659 17.4 (Type equivalence) p1.3:
Two template-ids refer to the same class, function, or variable if
...
their corresponding non-type template arguments of integral or
enumeration type have identical values
...
It looks that for non-type template arguments the template type
equivalence is b
Hi there,
On Mon, 19 May 2008, 15:59:16 +0200, FX wrote:
> [...]
> Any comments? Is it OK to commit as is?
this may sound like nit-picking, but the length of a string cannot be
negative, so, I'd rather make the new parameter `len' an "unsigned int"
or even size_t.
HTH, cheers.
l8er
manfred
}
> >+ if (!INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (t))
>
> 'else if' here?
In theory, yes, but, why? If the first 'if' part evaluates to true,
control flow jumps out of the function, hence the following 'if' is
totally correct (unless someone #define's return to something else...),
or do the GCC/FSF codings conventions require this to be 'else if'?
> Diego.
Cheers.
l8er
manfred
> On Wed, Oct 03, 2007 at 12:24:27PM +0200, Manfred Schwarb wrote:
> > I'm in a loss where to search for the real cause. Has anybody a hint
> > how to proceed further?
>
> Sounds like weird-but-somewhat-determinist behaviour you can get when
> you do out-of-bound
27;s http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33638
I first hoped to get help to narrow things a bit further, as my
problem is really a bit strange, so I decided to first write an email.
I simply assigned it now to the middle-end, but of course it could
also be a gfortran issue.
Thanks,
Manfred
--
Ist Ihr Browser Vista-kompatibel? Jetzt die neuesten
Browser-Versionen downloaden: http://www.gmx.net/de/go/browser
real cause. Has anybody a hint how to
proceed further?
Should I post the code of this function here on the list (~300 LOC)?
Thanks,
Manfred
| I'd encourage you to work up a solid proposal for ISO/ANSI and
| propose it there.
Being a newbie, I'd appreciate contact/site details for submissions to the
ISO/ANSI standardisation forum (do I email [EMAIL PROTECTED]).
I will be happy to draft and submit a proposal, including a hopefully
co
(a reference to the flag
and initialisation code). This will introduce problems when linking code
generated by different versions of the compiler.
Manfred von Willich
ur case "main"; try inserting another dummy
function before main and check again. If you look at the other symbols
generated by GCC, you will see that it also creates a globally visible
symbol for main.
> Thanks,
> Inder
HTH, cheers.
l8er
manfred
t; > a "gmake bubblestrap" will not run into problems.
> >
> > I suspect the commit that broken gfortran is
> >
> > 2005-07-22 Manfred Hollstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * tree-ssa-structalias.c (merge_graph_nodes): Fix uninitiali
13 matches
Mail list logo
