building libstdc++ standalone

2012-06-18 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
Hi, Posted this query (attached below) to gcc-help. Did not get response yet so posting it here. Appreciate your help. http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-help/2012-06/msg00156.html (Copy attached below). Thanks, Kannan -Original Message- From: Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Sent: Tuesday

RE: 4.7.1 build failure in hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11

2012-06-17 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
/pa/lib2funcs.S $(srcdir)/config/pa/quadlib.c HOST_LIBGCC2_CFLAGS += -frandom-seed=fixed-seed +SHLIB_MAPFILES += $(srcdir)/config/pa/libgcc-pa.ver + Regards, Kannan -Original Message- From: Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 2:42 PM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject:

RE: 4.7.1 build failure in hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11

2012-06-15 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
.org] On Behalf Of Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Sent: Friday, June 15, 2012 2:38 PM To: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: 4.7.1 build failure in hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11 Hi, I am trying 4.7.1 build for hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11. Variable SHLIB_MAPFILES is not set for hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11 build. This is c

4.7.1 build failure in hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11

2012-06-15 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
Hi, I am trying 4.7.1 build for hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11. Variable SHLIB_MAPFILES is not set for hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11 build. This is causing the build failure. File: .../build/gcc/hppa1.1-hp-hpux11.11/libgcc/Makefile Generated from: .../gcc_src/libgcc/Makefile.in GCC 4.7.1 hppa1.1-hp-hpux1

RE: GCC Making a new PASS

2012-06-12 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
Hi Prakash, > statement ; print("%s %d\n", __FILE__, __LINE__); > So that when program is running I know which file which line of my program > is getting executed. Just curious to know. Is there any real world application/product where this will help? Can you give more context to this requireme

RE: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23.

2012-06-06 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
:0 in compile_file () #33 0x9c6b470:0 in do_compile () #34 0x9c6b9c0:0 in toplev_main (argc=49, argv=0x7fffeee8) #35 0xf564740:0 in main (argc=49, argv=0x7fffeee8) Regards, Kannan -Original Message----- From: Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:42 PM To:

RE: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23.

2012-06-06 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
age- From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:ging...@adacore.com] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2012 4:05 PM To: Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23. On Jun 6, 2012, at 12:27 PM, Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan wrote: &

RE: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23.

2012-06-06 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
error: in plus_constant, at explow.c:88 omp_get_ancestor_thread_num (int level) ^ Is there another patch to solve this issue? Basically, my bootstrap build (ia64-hpux-11.23) is failing due to this. Regards, Kannan -Original Message----- From: Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Sent: Wednesday, June 06,

RE: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23.

2012-06-06 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
lai, Kannan Jeganathan Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23. On Jun 6, 2012, at 9:10 AM, Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan wrote: > Hi Tristan, > >>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-05/msg00970.html >> I have not ap

RE: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23.

2012-06-06 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
IDmode, modifier=EXPAND_NORMAL, alt_rtl=0x0) #12 0x5f6d760:0 in expand_call_stmt (stmt=0x6545c0b0) #13 0x5f6da90:0 in expand_gimple_stmt_1 (stmt=0x6545c0b0) Testcase, GCC configuration, etc in the original post: http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-05/msg00371.html Regards, Kannan -----Original Message- From: Ma

RE: regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23.

2012-05-30 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
Thanks Tristan. I have not applied this patch. I will give it a try. Regards, Kannan -Original Message- From: Tristan Gingold [mailto:ging...@adacore.com] Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2012 1:46 PM To: Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: regression due to

regression due to r187199 explow.c? in target ia64-hp-hpux11.23.

2012-05-29 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
Hi, This modification (assertion) is causing failure in ia64-hp-hpux11.23: r187199 | rsandifo | 2012-05-05 10:41:49 -0700 (Sat, 05 May 2012) | 247 lines Changed paths: M /trunk/gcc/explow.c * explow.c (plus_constant, plus_constant_mode): Likewise. Assert that the mode is sensible. H

RE: 4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure.

2012-05-03 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
:14 PM To: Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Cc: gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: 4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure. On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 1:33 PM, Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan wrote: > Hi, > > Similarly for the following two test case which deals with VLA > de-a

RE: 4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure.

2012-05-03 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
Hi, Similarly for the following two test case which deals with VLA de-allocation in a branch back situation: 1. gcc.c-torture/execute/pr43220.c 2. gcc.c-torture/execute/20040811-1.c Regards, Kannan -Original Message- From: Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan Sent: Thursday, May 03

4.7.0 regression? gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure.

2012-05-03 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
Hi, This is regarding gcc.c-torture/execute/vla-dealloc-1.c failure. 4.7.0 ia64-hp-hpux: program timed out (time out 300 seconds). 4.7.0 ia64-redhat-linux: program timed out (time out 300 seconds). 4.7.0 x86_64-suse-linux: execution completes successfully. Inserting a printf statement in

pr45605.C devirtualize call failure in ia64-hp-hpux?

2012-04-30 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan
Hi, This is related to pr45605.C test. Reduced testcase struct B { virtual void Run(){}; }; struct D : public B { virtual void Run() { }; }; int main() { D d; static_cast(d).Run(); } With x86_64 linux the call to Run through object d is devirtualized. Whereas it looks like in ia6

pre-compiled versions of GCC for hp-ux

2012-04-16 Thread Mailaripillai, Kannan Jeganathan (STSD)
Hi, I belong to HP-UX Itanium/PA-RISC GCC compiler team. I noticed that the GCC page (http://gcc.gnu.org/install/binaries.html) that lists out the pre-compiled versions of GCC (for different platforms) does not contain the web link of "GCC for HP-UX 11i". Please let me know the procedure to get