This looks good. I just have one wordsmithing comment.
I would have listed the STB_SECONDARY differences in a different
order -- maybe (3 1 2 4). That puts the most general difference
first, and it matches the order used for the description of
STB_WEAK.
Randy
> -Original Message-
>
eference is
handled individually, so we don't need to say anything about
precedence of conflicting undefs.
So I agree with the suggestion to delete difference #5
and add the "otherwise matches STB_WEAK" statement.
Randy
>
> --
> Supra
>
> > -Original Message
This looks good. I just want to check one thing with you. In point 5
you state that unresolved secondary symbols have a zero value. Are
you implying that unresolved secondary symbols should not result in a
link or load-time error? If that's the case, you should also make it
clear that a second
