On 07/26/05 05:52 PM, Robert Dewar sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc wrote:
>
> > I also found, to my delight and surprise, that the same code appears
> > to perform between 10% and 20% better - in a rough, fairly imprecise
> > environment.
>
> why su
On 07/26/05 12:28 AM, Giovanni Bajo sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I added the -fstack-check switch to my makefile and recompiled with
> > various optimizations. I was pretty surprised at the file sizes that
> > showe
On 07/25/05 05:15 PM, Giovanni Bajo sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The problem is I'm getting core dumps (SEGV) that appears to come from
> > this code when I know it shouldn't be in the execution path. The code
&
On 07/25/05 05:15 PM, Giovanni Bajo sat at the `puter and typed:
> Louis LeBlanc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > The problem is I'm getting core dumps (SEGV) that appears to come from
> > this code when I know it shouldn't be in the execution path. The code
&
on the dev list.
Thanks for your time.
Lou
--
Louis LeBlanc [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fully Funded Hobbyist, KeySlapper Extrordinaire :þ
http://www.keyslapper.net Ô¿Ô¬
Key fingerprint = C5E7 4762 F071 CE3B ED51 4FB8 AF85
