Re: GCC 4.1.1 RC1

2006-05-23 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
GCC 4.1.1 RC1 is available from: ftp://gcc.gnu.org/pub/gcc/prerelease-4.1.1-20060517 Please download, build, and test these packages -- not trees checked out from SVN -- so that we can detect packaging problems. Please post test results here: http://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/GCC%204.1.1%20RC%20S

Re: gcc 4.1

2006-03-13 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
The appropriate place for such stuff is gcc@gcc.gnu.org Am Montag, 13.03.06 um 17:19 Uhr schrieb Helge Hess: Hi, new gcc release, new warnings ;-) Am I the only one who gets those: DOMElement.m:283: warning: pointer type mismatch in conditional expression For stuff like: objs[1] = _ns

Re: GCC 4.0 build fails on Mac OS X 10.3.9/Darwin kernel 7.9

2005-04-22 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
James E Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Andrew Pinski wrote: Does anyone read the installation instructions? Yes, but not everyone. And even people that read the docs can miss the info if they can't figure out which part of the docs they are supposed to be looking at. If you don't want people

successful bootstrap/install of GCC 4.0 RC1 on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86

2005-04-11 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
The system: === uname -a Darwin localhost 7.2.1 Darwin Kernel Version 7.2.1: Wed Jul 14 03:00:02 PDT 2004; root:tmp/xnu-7.2.1-1-root.obj/RELEASE_I386 x86 i386 gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/i386/3.3/specs Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc.

Successful bootstrap/install of current gcc 4.0 and 4.1 snapshots on OpenDarwin 7.2.1/x86 using the latest odcctools

2005-03-29 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
The system: === uname -a Darwin localhost 7.2.1 Darwin Kernel Version 7.2.1: Wed Jul 14 03:00:02 PDT 2004; root:tmp/xnu-7.2.1-1-root.obj/RELEASE_I386 x86 i386 gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/libexec/gcc/darwin/i386/3.3/specs Thread model: posix gcc version 3.3 20030304 (Apple Computer, Inc.

Re: Question about ObjC++ state

2005-03-03 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
Am Mittwoch, 02.03.05 um 03:52 Uhr schrieb Mike Stump: On Feb 28, 2005, at 3:41 AM, Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf wrote: I'd like to know what the 'official' position regarding ObjC++ is now. Anybody willing to clear up? Sure, why not... Either, someone will submit a clean, safe patch

Question about ObjC++ state

2005-02-28 Thread Lars Sonchocky-Helldorf
Now that the 4.0 Branch has been created and ObjC++ is still not in GCC (since Zem Laski seems to be to busy with other things currently and obviously nobody else is able to pick up the loose ends and do the merge) I'd like to know what the 'official' position regarding ObjC++ is now. I did not