I want to ask how I can find the bugs in bugzilla which are listed in
the "Quality Data" Table. It feels that there are more bugs which are
not listed. For example:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57694
Actually the compiler returns "not implemented" while compiling the
given example co
> > Is my code wrong
>
> Yes. You need to define A::x.
Grrr... so stupid! :-)
Yes, you are right. I stumbled that only a few lines generates an error. Yes,
the compiler optimize them out if the access is direct. With -O3
it compiles and links without errors also without having const int A::x
Hi all,
the following code fails with gcc 4.4.3,4.5.0 and 4.6 snapshot (some weeks old)
:
#include
using namespace std;
class A
{
public:
static const int x=10;
};
class Zgr_A
{
public:
A* operator->() { return (A*)0; }
};
template
class Zgr
{
public:
Hi all,
I play a bit with lto optimisation. As I see, some functions will be inlined
during link stage which is the expected result. But the function code which is
always inlined is not removed from the output file which will result in larger
output files.
Any additional option to use with gcc
Hi all,
I tried to compile the gcc 4.5.0 version, but got errors with gmp :-(
I did:
k...@mauersegler:~/work/gcc-4.5.0$ cp -pr ../gmp-5.0.1/ ./gmp
k...@mauersegler:~/work/gcc-4.5.0$ cp -pr ../mpfr-2.4.2/ ./mpfr
k...@mauersegler:~/work/gcc-4.5.0$ cp -pr ../mpc-0.8.1/ ./mpc
k...@mauersegler:~/wo
Hi all,
I tried to link a pthread application with -static and run into a segfault on
x86, same on powerpc.
I tried gcc 4.4.2 (linux/x86) and 4.0.2 for powerpc-unknown-linux-gnu
For the x86 linux example I got in gdb:
(gdb) bt
#0 0x in ?? ()
#1 0x08094d49 in __cxa_guard_release ()
#
