On Nov 29, 2007 2:09 PM, Ramana Radhakrishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Michael,
>
> I had a comment / query regarding Stage 2 where you talk about
> Function cloning for different targets.
>
> I understand that the mechanism is to have a hidden function pointer
> that actually gets initializ
On Nov 29, 2007 2:27 AM, Michael Meissner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the things that I've been interested in is adding support to GCC to
> compile individual functions with specific target options. I first presented
> a
> draft at the Google mini-summit, and then another draft at the GCC
Hi,
On Nov 27, 2007 12:13 AM, J.C. Pizarro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 26, 2007, Karthik Kumar wrote:
> > I would like to propose a set of diffs to enable compilation of gcc
> > without requiring flex/bison. I feel that this would greatly benefit
> > th
Hi,
I would like to propose a set of diffs to enable compilation of gcc
without requiring flex/bison. I feel that this would greatly benefit
the variety of users building gcc.
The only files which really need these are:
gcc/gengtype-lex.l
gcc/treelang/lex.l
gcc/treelang/parse.y
One more thing t
hook goes into expand_main; I'm looking forward to
using this framework.
Thank you once again!
Karthik
"V. Karthik Kumar" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I require help with some work i've been doing lately on gcc (4.2.1
> tree). I have managed to put some cod
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I require help with some work i've been doing lately on gcc (4.2.1
tree). I have managed to put some code in.
Now, for function compilation, i require to invoke the i386 (as of
now) backend multiple times and with different switches; one time wit
