Re: on how to compile gcc-4.6 correctly?

2010-09-06 Thread Justin P. Mattock
ame-pointer -fstack-protector -w" CXXFLAGS="${CFLAGS}" MAKEOPTS="{-j3}" keep in mind this is for a intel iMac... your system could be diff.. Justin P. Mattock

Re: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/mballoc.c:2993!

2010-08-07 Thread Justin P. Mattock
success, and built gmp mpfr just to make sure with all being a success. Justin P. Mattock

Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11

2010-08-04 Thread Justin P. Mattock
ppl/cloog(hosts system/new system etc..) figured once im able to boot the fresh system I'll probably rebuild with ppl/cloog added in. Justin P. Mattock

Re: Parma Polyhedra Library 0.11

2010-08-04 Thread Justin P. Mattock
ep in mind this is my first attempt to build gcc with all these packages in the source tree of gcc rather than building them separately. Justin P. Mattock

Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error

2010-04-19 Thread Justin P. Mattock
On 04/19/2010 02:17 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: On 19 April 2010 08:20, Justin P. Mattock wrote: On 04/18/2010 11:57 PM, Jie Zhang wrote: On 04/19/2010 02:43 PM, Justin P. Mattock wrote: I couldn't resist..(had to play), anyways I looked through the reports but didn't see anythin

Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error

2010-04-19 Thread Justin P. Mattock
On 04/18/2010 11:57 PM, Jie Zhang wrote: On 04/19/2010 02:43 PM, Justin P. Mattock wrote: I couldn't resist..(had to play), anyways I looked through the reports but didn't see anything that was familiar. so I went and created an entry: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=4379

Re: gcc- 4.6.0 20100416 rtmutex.c:1138:1: internal compiler error

2010-04-18 Thread Justin P. Mattock
nu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43791 Justin P. Mattock

Re: trunk's genmodes crashes on Ubuntu/Lucid (alpha2 snapshot) not on Debian/Sid [both AMD64 architecture]

2010-02-07 Thread Justin P. Mattock
very probably an strcmp bug inside Ubuntu/Lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/eglibc/+bug/518314 Sorry for the noise. you should be able to build gcc without issues i.g. just built over here(just make sure you have gettext, textinfo, etc.. all build tools); Justin P. Mattock

Re: i need help

2009-12-04 Thread Justin P. Mattock
your accounts settings before doing su/sudo make install? Justin P. Mattock

Re: I want to use C and C + +

2009-11-17 Thread Justin P. Mattock
__ Tchattez en direct en en vidéo avec vos amis ! http://www.windowslive.fr/messenger/ correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't windows have their own compiler? Justin P. Mattock

Re: pure64 patch for 4.5.0

2009-11-09 Thread Justin P. Mattock
Ian Lance Taylor wrote: "Justin P. Mattock" writes: wanting to know if there's a pure64 patch for 4.5.0 right now I've plugged in a pure64 patch for 4.4.1 on 4.5.0. will this be good or is there more to that needs to be added. http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/gcc-

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-09 Thread Justin P. Mattock
ory, and then looked at ldd /usr/bin/gcc* I see it pointing to /lib64(looking on my other system with 4.4.1 it points to /lib) Justin P. Mattock

pure64 patch for 4.5.0

2009-11-09 Thread Justin P. Mattock
hello, wanting to know if there's a pure64 patch for 4.5.0 right now I've plugged in a pure64 patch for 4.4.1 on 4.5.0. will this be good or is there more to that needs to be added. http://patches.cross-lfs.org/dev/gcc-4.4.1-pure64-1.patch Justin P. Mattock

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-04 Thread Justin P. Mattock
86k (17592186044415M overhead) 0xFFF0, lol, wut? It's possible that indicates some sort of memory corruption going on. Maybe valgrind can help, do you have that? cheers, DaveK Not sure how to use these.(need to read) Any quick commands I can do to get the info to you? Justin P. Mattock

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-04 Thread Justin P. Mattock
pile it(hopefully not difficult for gdb). So give me some time on this and I'll see if I can get this up and running, and add that patch to kernel then go from there. Justin P. Mattock

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-03 Thread Justin P. Mattock
process thunderbird... Justin P. Mattock

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-03 Thread Justin P. Mattock
with this compiler. Although a bit concerned building everything for the system with a compiler that shows some memory issue,but if you say its not the compiler, then I'll carry on with what I'm doing. (and use an older compiler for firefox). Justin P. Mattock

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-02 Thread Justin P. Mattock
it's something with the latest gcc(snapshot) right now she's been compiling firefox for 45min (then crapped out because I compiled nss without sqlite) without no omm-killer. Justin P. Mattock

Re: cc1plus invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x280da, order=0, oom_adj=0

2009-11-02 Thread Justin P. Mattock
I'(on the macbook), seems to be going for a good ten minutes before I hit an error with a header file(nss) I'll see if I can get this thing to compile all the way through. (knock on wood) then go from there. Justin P. Mattock